Selected article for: "allocation planning and resource allocation planning"

Author: Taylor, James W.; Taylor, Kathryn S.
Title: Combining Probabilistic Forecasts of COVID-19 Mortality in the United States
  • Cord-id: ggz4nll8
  • Document date: 2021_6_28
  • ID: ggz4nll8
    Snippet: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed forecasting models at the forefront of health policy making. Predictions of mortality, cases and hospitalisations help governments meet planning and resource allocation challenges. In this paper, we consider the weekly forecasting of the cumulative mortality due to COVID-19 at the national and state level in the U.S. Optimal decision-making requires a forecast of a probability distribution, rather than just a single point forecast. Interval forecasts are also imp
    Document: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed forecasting models at the forefront of health policy making. Predictions of mortality, cases and hospitalisations help governments meet planning and resource allocation challenges. In this paper, we consider the weekly forecasting of the cumulative mortality due to COVID-19 at the national and state level in the U.S. Optimal decision-making requires a forecast of a probability distribution, rather than just a single point forecast. Interval forecasts are also important, as they can support decision making and provide situational awareness. We consider the case where probabilistic forecasts have been provided by multiple forecasting teams, and we combine the forecasts to extract the wisdom of the crowd. We use a dataset that has been made publicly available from the COVID-19 Forecast Hub. A notable feature of the dataset is that the availability of forecasts from participating teams varies greatly across the 40 weeks in our study. We evaluate the accuracy of combining methods that have been previously proposed for interval forecasts and predictions of probability distributions. These include the use of the simple average, the median, and trimming methods. In addition, we propose several new weighted combining methods. Our results show that, although the median was very useful for the early weeks of the pandemic, the simple average was preferable thereafter, and that, as a history of forecast accuracy accumulates, the best results can be produced by a weighted combining method that uses weights that are inversely proportional to the historical accuracy of the individual forecasting teams.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute error and accuracy measure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • absolute error and accurate method: 1
    • absolute error and actual number: 1
    • absolute error and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • absolute error and lowest value: 1, 2
    • absolute error and lowest value mean: 1
    • absolute error and ma approach: 1
    • absolute error and machine learn: 1
    • absolute error and mae mean absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
    • absolute error and mae mean absolute error forecast: 1
    • accuracy compare and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accuracy compare and low high forecast: 1
    • accuracy compare and low high medium: 1
    • accuracy compare and low medium: 1
    • accuracy compare and low medium high: 1
    • accuracy compare and low mortality: 1