Selected article for: "academic study and additional treatment"

Author: Suter, Fredy; Consolaro, Elena; Pedroni, Stefania; Moroni, Chiara; Pastò, Elena; Paganini, Maria Vittoria; Pravettoni, Grazia; Cantarelli, Umberto; Rubis, Nadia; Perico, Norberto; Perna, Annalisa; Peracchi, Tobia; Ruggenenti, Piero; Remuzzi, Giuseppe
Title: A simple, home-therapy algorithm to prevent hospitalisation for COVID-19 patients: A retrospective observational matched-cohort study
  • Cord-id: jpxl2zhs
  • Document date: 2021_6_9
  • ID: jpxl2zhs
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Effective home treatment algorithms implemented based on a pathophysiologic and pharmacologic rationale to accelerate recovery and prevent hospitalisation of patients with early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) would have major implications for patients and health system. METHODS: This academic, matched-cohort study compared outcomes of 90 consecutive consenting patients with mild COVID-19 treated at home by their family physicians between October 2020 and January 2021 in Northern
    Document: BACKGROUND: Effective home treatment algorithms implemented based on a pathophysiologic and pharmacologic rationale to accelerate recovery and prevent hospitalisation of patients with early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) would have major implications for patients and health system. METHODS: This academic, matched-cohort study compared outcomes of 90 consecutive consenting patients with mild COVID-19 treated at home by their family physicians between October 2020 and January 2021 in Northern and Central Italy, according to the proposed recommendation algorithm, with outcomes for 90 age-, sex-, and comorbidities-matched patients who received other therapeutic regimens. Primary outcome was time to resolution of major symptoms. Secondary outcomes included prevention of hospitalisation. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. FINDINGS: All patients achieved complete remission. The median [IQR] time to resolution of major symptoms was 18 [14–23] days in the ‘recommended schedule' cohort and 14 [7–30] days in the matched ‘control’ cohort (p = 0·033). Other symptoms persisted in a lower percentage of patients in the ‘recommended’ than in the ‘control’ cohort (23·3% versus 73·3%, respectively, p<0·0001) and for a shorter period (p = 0·0107). Two patients in the ‘recommended’ cohort were hospitalised compared to 13 (14·4%) controls (p = 0·0103). The prevention algorithm reduced the days and cumulative costs of hospitalisation by >90%. INTERPRETATION: Implementation of an early home treatment algorithm failed to accelerate recovery from major symptoms of COVID-19, but reduced the risk of hospitalisation and related treatment costs. Given the study design, additional research would be required to consolidate the proposed treatment recommendations. FUNDING: Fondazione Cav.Lav. Carlo Pesenti

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute viral infection and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute viral infection and low molecular: 1, 2
    • acute viral infection and low molecular weight: 1, 2
    • acute viral infection and low percentage: 1
    • acute viral infection and macrophage activation: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • additional analysis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • additional research and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • additional research and lombardy region: 1
    • additional research and low molecular: 1
    • additional research and low molecular weight: 1
    • administer treatment and logistic regression: 1