Selected article for: "acute ards distress respiratory syndrome and logistic regression model"

Author: Liang, Mengyuan; He, Miao; Tang, Jian; He, Xinliang; Liu, Zhijun; Feng, Siwei; Chen, Ping; Li, Hui; Xue, Yu’e; Bai, Tao; Ma, Yanling; Zhang, Jianchu
Title: Novel risk scoring system for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China
  • Cord-id: 9zyqgkvi
  • Document date: 2020_12_17
  • ID: 9zyqgkvi
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: The mortality rate from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is high among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hence, risk evaluation tools are required to immediately identify high-risk patients upon admission for early intervention. METHODS: A cohort of 220 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. To analyze the risk factors of ARDS, data obtained from approximately 70% of the participants were randomly selected and used as t
    Document: BACKGROUND: The mortality rate from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is high among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hence, risk evaluation tools are required to immediately identify high-risk patients upon admission for early intervention. METHODS: A cohort of 220 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. To analyze the risk factors of ARDS, data obtained from approximately 70% of the participants were randomly selected and used as training dataset to establish a logistic regression model. Meanwhile, data obtained from the remaining 30% of the participants were used as test dataset to validate the effect of the model. RESULTS: Lactate dehydrogenase, blood urea nitrogen, D-dimer, procalcitonin, and ferritin levels were included in the risk score system and were assigned a score of 25, 15, 34, 20, and 24, respectively. The cutoff value for the total score was > 35, with a sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 81.20%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test were 0.967 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.925–0.989) and 0.437(P Value = 0.437). The model had excellent discrimination and calibration during internal validation. CONCLUSIONS: The novel risk score may be a valuable risk evaluation tool for screening patients with COVID-19 who are at high risk of ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-020-05561-y.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acid testing and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acid testing and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acid testing and lung injury: 1, 2, 3
    • acid testing and lung protective: 1
    • admission identify and liver function: 1, 2
    • admission identify and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • admission identify and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
    • admission identify and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • admission perform and logistic regression: 1
    • liver function and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • liver function and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • liver function and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • liver function and lung injury: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and lr positive likelihood ratio: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • logistic regression analysis and lung protective: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and lr positive likelihood ratio: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • logistic regression and lung protective: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6