Author: Liang, Mengyuan; He, Miao; Tang, Jian; He, Xinliang; Liu, Zhijun; Feng, Siwei; Chen, Ping; Li, Hui; Xue, Yu’e; Bai, Tao; Ma, Yanling; Zhang, Jianchu
Title: Novel risk scoring system for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China Cord-id: 9zyqgkvi Document date: 2020_12_17
ID: 9zyqgkvi
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The mortality rate from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is high among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hence, risk evaluation tools are required to immediately identify high-risk patients upon admission for early intervention. METHODS: A cohort of 220 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. To analyze the risk factors of ARDS, data obtained from approximately 70% of the participants were randomly selected and used as t
Document: BACKGROUND: The mortality rate from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is high among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hence, risk evaluation tools are required to immediately identify high-risk patients upon admission for early intervention. METHODS: A cohort of 220 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. To analyze the risk factors of ARDS, data obtained from approximately 70% of the participants were randomly selected and used as training dataset to establish a logistic regression model. Meanwhile, data obtained from the remaining 30% of the participants were used as test dataset to validate the effect of the model. RESULTS: Lactate dehydrogenase, blood urea nitrogen, D-dimer, procalcitonin, and ferritin levels were included in the risk score system and were assigned a score of 25, 15, 34, 20, and 24, respectively. The cutoff value for the total score was > 35, with a sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 81.20%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test were 0.967 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.925–0.989) and 0.437(P Value = 0.437). The model had excellent discrimination and calibration during internal validation. CONCLUSIONS: The novel risk score may be a valuable risk evaluation tool for screening patients with COVID-19 who are at high risk of ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-020-05561-y.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- liver function and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- liver function and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- liver function and lung injury: 1
- liver function and lung tissue: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- liver function and lung tissue biopsy: 1
- liver function and lymphocyte addition: 1, 2
- liver function and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36
- liver function and lymphocyte count decrease: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression analysis and lr positive likelihood ratio: 1
- logistic regression analysis and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- logistic regression analysis and lung protective: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression analysis and lung tissue: 1, 2
- logistic regression and lr positive likelihood ratio: 1, 2, 3
- logistic regression and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- logistic regression and lung protective: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- logistic regression and lung tissue: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- logistic regression and lymphocyte addition: 1, 2, 3, 4
- logistic regression and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- logistic regression and lymphocyte count decrease: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date