Selected article for: "disease spread reduce and RT PCR test"

Author: Fernandez-Montero, Alejandro; Argemi, Josepmaria; Rodríguez, José Antonio; Ariño, Arturo H.; Moreno-Galarraga, Laura
Title: Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values
  • Cord-id: 5hkr2hon
  • Document date: 2021_6_9
  • ID: 5hkr2hon
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as SARS-CoV-2 screening tools performed in asymptomatic adults from a semi-closed community in University of Navarra (Spain) from Nove
    Document: BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce disease spread. Rapid antigen tests have not been sufficiently evaluated in asymptomatic patients to be used as massive population screening tools. METHODS: Head-to-head evaluation of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as SARS-CoV-2 screening tools performed in asymptomatic adults from a semi-closed community in University of Navarra (Spain) from November 2020 to January 2021. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated using RT-PCR as reference method. FINDINGS: Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was performed on 2542 asymptomatic adults in a community with a SARS-CoV-2 incidence of 1·93%. It showed a sensitivity of 71·43% (CI 95%: 56·74 – 83·42) and a specificity of 99·68% (CI 95%: 99·37 - 99·86). Positive Predictive Value was 81·4 (CI 95% 66·6 – 91·61) and Negative Predictive Value was 99·44 (CI 95% 99·06 – 99·69). Test sensitivity was related to viral load, with higher sensitivity in RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values under 25 (93·75%, CI 95%: 71·96 – 98·93), that dropped to 29·41% (CI 95%: 10·31- 55·96) in RT-PCR Ct values above 25. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that rapid antigen tests are less effective in asymptomatic population, when compared with RT-PCR. Further studies are needed to evaluate different options to improve screenings based on rapid antigen test, such as the use of clinical questionnaires to select higher risk-participants, the confirmation of negative results with RT-PCR or the use of repetitive sequential testing. FUNDING: This research received no external funding.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute infection and local prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute infection and low capacity: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory and additional study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and local prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • acute respiratory and long term measure: 1
    • acute respiratory and long turnaround time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute respiratory and long turnaround time require: 1
    • acute respiratory and low capacity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute sars and additional study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • acute sars and local prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acute sars and long term measure: 1
    • acute sars and long turnaround time: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute sars and long turnaround time require: 1
    • acute sars and low capacity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
    • additional study and address limitation: 1
    • additional study and local prevalence: 1
    • additional study and low capacity: 1, 2
    • local prevalence and low capacity: 1, 2