Author: Lucas Böttcher; Mingtao Xia; Tom Chou
                    Title: Why estimating population-based case fatality rates during epidemics may be misleading  Document date: 2020_3_30
                    ID: embnko1q_92
                    
                    Snippet: In Fig. 3 of the main text, we observe that the population-level mortality ratio M 0 p (t) approaches a plateau during the initial exponential growth phase of an epidemic (i.e., for S(t) ≈ S 0 ). If the number of new infections decreases (e.g., due to quarantine measures), M 0 p (t) starts growing until it reaches its asymptotic value M 0 p (∞). Interestingly, the pre-asymptotic values of M 0 p (t) are smaller for larger infection rates β 1 .....
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: In Fig. 3 of the main text, we observe that the population-level mortality ratio M 0 p (t) approaches a plateau during the initial exponential growth phase of an epidemic (i.e., for S(t) ≈ S 0 ). If the number of new infections decreases (e.g., due to quarantine measures), M 0 p (t) starts growing until it reaches its asymptotic value M 0 p (∞). Interestingly, the pre-asymptotic values of M 0 p (t) are smaller for larger infection rates β 1 (see Fig. S5(a) ). This counter-intuitive effect arises because larger values of β 1 generate relatively larger numbers of new infected which have a lower chance of dying before τ inc (see Eq. (4) in the main text). A similar effect occurs for non-delayed transmission (i.e., τ β ≈ 0). We observe a similar effect for non-delayed transmissions (i.e., τ β ≈ 0). As long as S(t) ≈ S0, smaller transmission delays τ β lead to larger relative numbers of new infections and smaller M 0 p (t).
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- epidemic growth phase and exponential epidemic growth phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
  - epidemic growth phase and growth phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57
  - epidemic growth phase and infection rate: 1
  - epidemic growth phase and initial exponential epidemic growth phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  - epidemic growth phase and new infection: 1, 2
  - epidemic growth phase and transmission delay: 1
  - exponential epidemic growth phase and growth phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
  - exponential epidemic growth phase and initial exponential epidemic growth phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  - exponential epidemic growth phase and transmission delay: 1
  - growth phase and infection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
  - growth phase and initial exponential epidemic growth phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  - growth phase and new infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
  - growth phase and new infection number: 1
  - growth phase and population level: 1
  - growth phase and similar effect: 1
  - growth phase and transmission delay: 1
  - τ β lead and new infection: 1
  
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date