Selected article for: "lmu munich and ludwig maximilians university"

Author: Stecher, Stephanie-Susanne; Anton, Sofia; Fraccaroli, Alessia; Götschke, Jeremias; Stemmler, Hans Joachim; Barnikel, Michaela
Title: Lung ultrasound predicts clinical course but not outcome in COVID-19 ICU patients: a retrospective single-center analysis
  • Cord-id: 94twb58r
  • Document date: 2021_6_28
  • ID: 94twb58r
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Point-of-care lung ultrasound (LU) is an established tool in the first assessment of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of lung ultrasound in COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients in predicting clinical course and outcome. METHODS: We analyzed lung ultrasound score (LUS) of all COVID-19 patients admitted from March 2020 to December 2020 to the Internal Intensive Care Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) of Munich.
    Document: BACKGROUND: Point-of-care lung ultrasound (LU) is an established tool in the first assessment of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of lung ultrasound in COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients in predicting clinical course and outcome. METHODS: We analyzed lung ultrasound score (LUS) of all COVID-19 patients admitted from March 2020 to December 2020 to the Internal Intensive Care Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) of Munich. LU was performed according to a standardized protocol at ICU admission and in case of clinical deterioration with the need for intubation. A normal lung scores 0 points, the worst LUS has 24 points. Patients were stratified in a low (0–12 points) and a high (13–24 points) lung ultrasound score group. RESULTS: The study included 42 patients, 69% of them male. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (81%) and obesity (57%). The values of pH (7.42 ± 0.09 vs 7.35 ± 0.1; p = 0.047) and p(a)O(2) (107 [80–130] vs 80 [66–93] mmHg; p = 0.034) were significantly reduced in patients of the high LUS group. Furthermore, the duration of ventilation (12.5 [8.3–25] vs 36.5 [9.8–70] days; p = 0.029) was significantly prolonged in this group. Patchy subpleural thickening (n = 38; 90.5%) and subpleural consolidations (n = 23; 54.8%) were present in most patients. Pleural effusion was rare (n = 4; 9.5%). The median total LUS was 11.9 ± 3.9 points. In case of clinical deterioration with the need for intubation, LUS worsened significantly compared to baseline LU. Twelve patients died during the ICU stay (29%). There was no difference in survival in both LUS groups (75% vs 66.7%, p = 0.559). CONCLUSIONS: LU can be a useful monitoring tool to predict clinical course but not outcome of COVID-19 ICU patients and can early recognize possible deteriorations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01396-5.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute physiology chronic health evaluation ii and liver renal: 1
    • acute physiology chronic health evaluation ii and los length: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory failure and additional file: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acute respiratory failure and liver renal: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • acute respiratory failure and liver renal failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute respiratory failure and los length: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • additional file and liver renal: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • additional file and liver renal failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • admission record and los length: 1