Selected article for: "abdominal surgery and los hospital stay"

Author: Cannesson, Maxime; Ramsingh, Davinder; Rinehart, Joseph; Demirjian, Aram; Vu, Trung; Vakharia, Shermeen; Imagawa, David; Yu, Zhaoxia; Greenfield, Sheldon; Kain, Zeev
Title: Perioperative goal-directed therapy and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery: a historical-prospective, comparative effectiveness study.
  • Cord-id: 4fg3u4n6
  • Document date: 2015_1_1
  • ID: 4fg3u4n6
    Snippet: INTRODUCTION Perioperative goal-directed therapy (PGDT) may improve postoperative outcome in high-risk surgery patients but its adoption has been slow. In 2012, we initiated a performance improvement (PI) project focusing on the implementation of PGDT during high-risk abdominal surgeries. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention. METHODS This is a historical prospective quality improvement study. The goal of this initiative was to standardize the
    Document: INTRODUCTION Perioperative goal-directed therapy (PGDT) may improve postoperative outcome in high-risk surgery patients but its adoption has been slow. In 2012, we initiated a performance improvement (PI) project focusing on the implementation of PGDT during high-risk abdominal surgeries. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention. METHODS This is a historical prospective quality improvement study. The goal of this initiative was to standardize the way fluid management and hemodynamic optimization are conducted during high-risk abdominal surgery in the Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery at the University of California Irvine. For fluid management, the protocol consisted in standardized baseline crystalloid administration of 3 ml/kg/hour and any additional boluses based on PGDT. The impact of the intervention was assessed on the length of stay in the hospital (LOS) and post-operative complications (NSQIP database). RESULTS In the 1 year pre- and post-implementation periods, 128 and 202 patients were included. The average volume of fluid administered during the case was 9.9 (7.1-13.0) ml/kg/hour in the pre-implementation period and 6.6 (4.7-9.5) ml/kg/hour in the post-implementation period (p < 0.01). LOS decreased from 10 (6-16) days to 7 (5-11) days (p = 0.0001). Based on the multiple linear regression analysis, the estimated coefficient for intervention was 0.203 (SE = 0.054, p = 0.0002) indicating that, with the other conditions being held the same, introducing intervention reduced LOS by 18% (95% confidence interval 9-27%). The incidence of NSQIP complications decreased from 39% to 25% (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION These results suggest that the implementation of a PI program focusing on the implementation of PGDT can transform fluid administration patterns and improve postoperative outcome in patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02057653. Registered 17 December 2013.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abdominal surgery and los hospital stay: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • abdominal surgery and los hospital stay length: 1, 2, 3, 4