Selected article for: "group comparison and statistical software"

Author: Lucia de Noronha; Camila Zanluca; Marion Burger; Andreia Akemi Suzukawa; Marina Azevedo; Patricia Z. Rebutini; Iolanda Maria Novadzki; Laurina Setsuko Tanabe; Mayra Marinho Presibella; Claudia Nunes Duarte dos Santos
Title: Zika Virus Infection at Different Pregnancy Stages: Anatomopathological Findings, Target Cells and Viral Persistence in Placental Tissues
  • Document date: 2018_7_16
  • ID: d28hr3fv_9
    Snippet: ) for both routine hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining and IHC staining. Villus maturation was evaluated by considering the villus morphology and the gestational age at delivery. Morphometric analyses were performed in placental tissue specimens from mothers who were infected with ZIKV during the third trimester of pregnancy (n = 6). A negative control group (n = 5) was used for comparison (Baurakiades et al., 2011) . For each case, 30 high-power fi.....
    Document: ) for both routine hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining and IHC staining. Villus maturation was evaluated by considering the villus morphology and the gestational age at delivery. Morphometric analyses were performed in placental tissue specimens from mothers who were infected with ZIKV during the third trimester of pregnancy (n = 6). A negative control group (n = 5) was used for comparison (Baurakiades et al., 2011) . For each case, 30 high-power fields (HPFs = 400×) were randomly selected, and the villi, CD163+ HCs, knots and sprouts in each field were counted. The mean values of these parameters over the 30 fields were used for the statistical analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.03 software. The Zikainfected and uninfected control groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p<0.05.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • control group and gestational age: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control group and GraphPad Prism software: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • control group and hematoxylin eosin: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • control group and high power: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • control group and Mann Whitney test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control group and Mann Whitney test compare: 1, 2, 3
    • control group and mean value: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • control group and morphometric analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • control group and placental tissue: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • delivery gestational age and gestational age: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • delivery gestational age and mean value: 1
    • delivery gestational age and morphometric analysis: 1
    • delivery gestational age and placental tissue: 1
    • gestational age and hematoxylin eosin: 1
    • gestational age and Mann Whitney test: 1
    • gestational age and mean value: 1, 2, 3
    • gestational age and morphometric analysis: 1
    • gestational age and placental tissue: 1, 2, 3
    • GraphPad Prism software and hematoxylin eosin: 1