Author: Timen, Aura; Hulscher, Marlies E.J.L.; Rust, Laura; van Steenbergen, Jim E.; Akkermans, Reinier P.; Grol, Richard P.T.M.; van der Meer, Jos W.M.
Title: Barriers to implementing infection prevention and control guidelines during crises: Experiences of health care professionals Cord-id: 4iff3pix Document date: 2010_6_7
ID: 4iff3pix
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Communicable disease crises can endanger the health care system and often require special guidelines. Understanding reasons for nonadherence to crisis guidelines is needed to improve crisis management. We identified and measured barriers and conditions for optimal adherence as perceived by 4 categories of health care professionals. METHODS: In-depth interviews were performed (n = 26) to develop a questionnaire for a cross-sectional survey of microbiologists (100% response), infection
Document: BACKGROUND: Communicable disease crises can endanger the health care system and often require special guidelines. Understanding reasons for nonadherence to crisis guidelines is needed to improve crisis management. We identified and measured barriers and conditions for optimal adherence as perceived by 4 categories of health care professionals. METHODS: In-depth interviews were performed (n = 26) to develop a questionnaire for a cross-sectional survey of microbiologists (100% response), infection preventionists (74% response), public health physicians (96% response), and public health nurses (82% response). The groups were asked to appraise barriers encountered during 4 outbreaks (severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS], Clostridium difficile ribotype 027, rubella, and avian influenza) according to a 5-point Likert scale. When at least 33% of the participants responded “strongly agree,†“agree,†or “rather agree than disagree,†a barrier was defined as “often experienced.†The common (“genericâ€) barriers were included in a univariate and multivariate model. Barriers specific to the various groups were studied as well. RESULTS: Crisis guidelines were found to have 4 generic barriers to adherence: (1) lack of imperative or precise wording, (2) lack of easily identifiable instructions specific to each profession, (3) lack of concrete performance targets, and (4) lack of timely and adequate guidance on personal protective equipment and other safety measures. The cross-sectional study also yielded profession-specific sets of often-experienced barriers. CONCLUSION: To improve adherence to crisis guidelines, the generic barriers should be addressed when developing guidelines, irrespective of the infectious agent. Profession-specific barriers require profession-specific strategies to change attitudes, ensure organizational facilities, and provide an adequate setting for crisis management.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute phase and adherence improve: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional criterion: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute respiratory syndrome and adequate preparation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute respiratory syndrome and adequate setting: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and adequate time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- acute respiratory syndrome and adequate timely: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- acute respiratory syndrome and adherence barrier: 1, 2
- acute respiratory syndrome and adherence improve: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- acute respiratory syndrome and local hospital: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- adequate time and adherence improve: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date