Selected article for: "accuracy improve and classification performance"

Author: Hussain, Lal; Nguyen, Tony; Li, Haifang; Abbasi, Adeel A.; Lone, Kashif J.; Zhao, Zirun; Zaib, Mahnoor; Chen, Anne; Duong, Tim Q.
Title: Machine-learning classification of texture features of portable chest X-ray accurately classifies COVID-19 lung infection
  • Cord-id: mehh4pdy
  • Document date: 2020_11_25
  • ID: mehh4pdy
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: The large volume and suboptimal image quality of portable chest X-rays (CXRs) as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could post significant challenges for radiologists and frontline physicians. Deep-learning artificial intelligent (AI) methods have the potential to help improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy for reading portable CXRs. PURPOSE: The study aimed at developing an AI imaging analysis tool to classify COVID-19 lung infection based on portable CXRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
    Document: BACKGROUND: The large volume and suboptimal image quality of portable chest X-rays (CXRs) as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could post significant challenges for radiologists and frontline physicians. Deep-learning artificial intelligent (AI) methods have the potential to help improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy for reading portable CXRs. PURPOSE: The study aimed at developing an AI imaging analysis tool to classify COVID-19 lung infection based on portable CXRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Public datasets of COVID-19 (N = 130), bacterial pneumonia (N = 145), non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia (N = 145), and normal (N = 138) CXRs were analyzed. Texture and morphological features were extracted. Five supervised machine-learning AI algorithms were used to classify COVID-19 from other conditions. Two-class and multi-class classification were performed. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired two-tailed t tests with unequal variance between groups. Performance of classification models used the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: For the two-class classification, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 100%, 100%, and 100% for COVID-19 vs normal; 96.34%, 95.35% and 97.44% for COVID-19 vs bacterial pneumonia; and 97.56%, 97.44% and 97.67% for COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia. For the multi-class classification, the combined accuracy and AUC were 79.52% and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: AI classification of texture and morphological features of portable CXRs accurately distinguishes COVID-19 lung infection in patients in multi-class datasets. Deep-learning methods have the potential to improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy for portable CXRs.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accordingly classify and accuracy specificity sensitivity: 1
    • accuracy complexity and acute respiratory syndrome: 1
    • accuracy level and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • accuracy level and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • accuracy specificity and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accuracy specificity and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accuracy specificity sensitivity and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accuracy specificity sensitivity and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • accurate result and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2
    • accurately identify and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • accurately identify and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16