Author: Lopes, Agnaldo J; Mafort, Thiago T; da Cal, Mariana S; Monnerat, Laura B; Litrento, PatrÃcia F; Ramos, Ingrid; de Oliveira, Raphael F J; da Costa, Claudia H; Rufino, Rogério
Title: Impulse Oscillometry Findings and Their Associations With Lung Ultrasound Signs in COVID-19 Survivors Cord-id: jkqyploi Document date: 2021_1_1
ID: jkqyploi
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Because impulse oscillometry (IOS) can detect changes in the small airways and is safer to perform during the COVID-19 pandemic than other pulmonary function tests, it may have value in investigating pulmonary sequelae in COVID-19 survivors. This study evaluated the performance of IOS in detecting lung abnormalities in COVID-19 survivors and investigated the associations of the findings with those of lung ultrasound (LUS) and spirometry. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 117 su
Document: BACKGROUND: Because impulse oscillometry (IOS) can detect changes in the small airways and is safer to perform during the COVID-19 pandemic than other pulmonary function tests, it may have value in investigating pulmonary sequelae in COVID-19 survivors. This study evaluated the performance of IOS in detecting lung abnormalities in COVID-19 survivors and investigated the associations of the findings with those of lung ultrasound (LUS) and spirometry. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 117 subjects underwent IOS at a frequency range of 4-20 Hz 2 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. They also underwent spirometry and LUS, and their aeration scores were calculated. RESULTS: On IOS, the resonance frequency was > 12 Hz, and the area under the reactance curve was > 3.60 cm H2O/L/s in 70 (59.8%) and 55 (47.0%) subjects, respectively. A heterogeneity of resistance between R4 and R20 (R4-R20) > 20% was observed in 60 (51.3%) participants. Based on their abnormalities in resistive and reactive parameters, 76 (65.0%) participants had abnormal IOS. Spirometry abnormalities were detected in 40 (34.2%) cases. LUS was abnormal in 51 (43.6%) participants, and the median aeration score was 0 (0-8) points. Abnormal IOS was associated with abnormal LUS (P < .001) and abnormal spirometry (P = .002). Abnormal spirometry had a significant but weaker association with abnormal LUS (P = .031). In participants who reported hospitalization, abnormal IOS was associated with both abnormal LUS (P = .001) and abnormal spirometry (P = .006). In participants who did not report hospitalization, abnormal IOS was associated with abnormal LUS (P < .001) but not abnormal spirometry (P = .063). CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 survivors, IOS detected changes even when spirometry is normal. In these individuals, IOS parameters were more strongly associated with abnormalities on LUS than with abnormalities on spirometry.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abnormal lus and lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- abnormal lus and lus abnormal: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- abnormal lus and lus abnormality: 1
- abnormal lus and lus lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- abnormal spirometry and lung abnormality: 1
- lung abnormality and lus abnormal: 1
- lung abnormality and lus abnormality: 1
- lung abnormality and lus lung ultrasound: 1
- lung ultrasound and lus abnormal: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- lung ultrasound and lus abnormality: 1, 2
- lung ultrasound and lus lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- lung ultrasound and lus spirometry: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date