Selected article for: "confirm diagnosis and study design"

Author: Choi, Janet S.; Yin, Victoria; Wu, Franklin; Bhatt, Neel K.; O'Dell, Karla; Johns, Michael
Title: Utility of Telemedicine for Diagnosis and Management of Laryngology‐Related Complaints during COVID‐19
  • Cord-id: 3t0pvp4v
  • Document date: 2021_8_24
  • ID: 3t0pvp4v
    Snippet: OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the concordance in diagnosis and management between initial telemedicine visits and subsequent in‐person visits with laryngoscopy for laryngology‐related complaints during COVID‐19. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients who presented to a tertiary care center with laryngology‐related complaints (voice, swallowing, airway, general throat complaints and others) and completed initial telemedicine visits and subsequent in‐person v
    Document: OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the concordance in diagnosis and management between initial telemedicine visits and subsequent in‐person visits with laryngoscopy for laryngology‐related complaints during COVID‐19. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients who presented to a tertiary care center with laryngology‐related complaints (voice, swallowing, airway, general throat complaints and others) and completed initial telemedicine visits and subsequent in‐person visits with laryngoscopy between March and October 2020 were included (n = 250). Preliminary diagnoses and managements provided during initial telemedicine visits were compared with the diagnoses and managements during subsequent in‐person visits with laryngoscopy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to compare concordance rates in diagnosis and management by chief complaint categories after adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: Overall concordance rates in diagnosis and management between the initial telemedicine visit and subsequent laryngoscopy exam were 86.1% and 93.7%, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) days until laryngoscopy from the initial visit were 21.2 (23.0). Concordance rates were not associated with patient's age, gender, preferred language, provider, telemedicine visit duration, or days until laryngoscopy. Management concordance rate was relatively lower among patients with general throat complaints in comparison with voice‐related complaints (odds ratio: 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.90). Management changes after laryngoscopy included need for further imaging, procedures, voice therapy, and referral to other specialists. CONCLUSION: Concordance rates in diagnosis and management remained high between the initial telemedicine visit and subsequent in‐person visit with laryngoscopy for new patients presenting with laryngology‐related complaints during the COVID‐19 pandemic. While laryngoscopy is still essential to confirm diagnosis and provide appropriate management, telemedicine may be a feasible alternative to provide suitable empiric therapy until laryngoscopy can be safely performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Laryngoscope, 2021

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • accurate diagnosis and additional intervention: 1
    • accurate diagnosis and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accurate diagnosis and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • accurate diagnosis and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • accurate diagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
    • acute rhinosinusitis and magnetic resonance: 1
    • acute rhinosinusitis and magnetic resonance imaging: 1
    • additional assessment and magnetic resonance: 1, 2
    • additional assessment and magnetic resonance imaging: 1, 2
    • additional imaging and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • additional imaging and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • additional imaging and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • additional imaging and magnetic resonance imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • additional intervention and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • additional intervention and logistic regression model: 1
    • additional intervention and magnetic resonance: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and low sample size: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • logistic regression analysis and magnetic resonance imaging: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11