Selected article for: "cross validation and spatial distribution"

Author: Moritz Mercker; Uwe Betzin; Dennis Wilken
Title: What influences COVID-19 infection rates: A statistical approach to identify promising factors applied to infection data from Germany
  • Document date: 2020_4_17
  • ID: 09nvausz_32
    Snippet: Overall, there is a very coherent picture of the spatial distribution of the different β-values: In all cases, the distribution is spatially inhomogeneous, showing in particular in the centre of Germany (on the boarder of Türinghen, and Hessen) a lower decay in infection rates compared to the average development. Indeed, both states show distinct larger beta values also in our analysis on the state-level (3). Only the cross-validation based GAM.....
    Document: Overall, there is a very coherent picture of the spatial distribution of the different β-values: In all cases, the distribution is spatially inhomogeneous, showing in particular in the centre of Germany (on the boarder of Türinghen, and Hessen) a lower decay in infection rates compared to the average development. Indeed, both states show distinct larger beta values also in our analysis on the state-level (3). Only the cross-validation based GAMM-plot for β 3 (4 third row, plot on the right-hand side) shows a much coarser spatial resolution. A possible explanation is that for the calculation of β 3 much less data (namely infection data from only the last two weeks) have been used, which may lead to a larger unexplained variance, which finally leads to a more conservative estimate of spatial heterogeneity during the cross-validation procedure.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • coherent picture and infection rate: 1
    • conservative estimate and infection rate: 1, 2
    • cross validation and β value: 1, 2
    • cross validation and infection rate: 1
    • different β value and β value: 1, 2
    • β value and infection rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8