Author: Baggott, Christina; Hardy, Jo Katherine; Sparks, Jenny; Sabbagh, Doñah; Beasley, Richard; Weatherall, Mark; Fingleton, James
Title: Epinephrine (adrenaline) compared to selective beta-2-agonist in adults or children with acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cord-id: a9pw5vow Document date: 2021_9_30
ID: a9pw5vow
Snippet: BACKGROUND International asthma guidelines recommend against epinephrine (adrenaline) administration in acute asthma unless associated with anaphylaxis or angio-oedema. However, administration of intramuscular epinephrine in addition to nebulised selective β2-agonist is recommended for acute severe or life-threatening asthma in many prehospital guidelines. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of epinephrine in comparison to selective β2-agonist in acute asthma. METHODS We
Document: BACKGROUND International asthma guidelines recommend against epinephrine (adrenaline) administration in acute asthma unless associated with anaphylaxis or angio-oedema. However, administration of intramuscular epinephrine in addition to nebulised selective β2-agonist is recommended for acute severe or life-threatening asthma in many prehospital guidelines. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of epinephrine in comparison to selective β2-agonist in acute asthma. METHODS We included peer-reviewed publications of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled children or adults in any healthcare setting and compared epinephrine by any route to selective β2-agonist by any route for an acute asthma exacerbation. The primary outcome was treatment failure, including hospitalisation, need for intubation or death. RESULTS Thirty-eight of 1140 studies were included. Overall quality of evidence was low. Seventeen studies contributed data on 1299 participants to the meta-analysis. There was significant statistical heterogeneity, I2=56%. The pooled Peto's OR for treatment failure with epinephrine versus selective β2-agonist was 0.99 (0.75 to 1.32), p=0.95. There was strong evidence that recruitment age group was associated with different estimates of the odds of treatment failure; with studies recruiting adults-only having lower odds of treatment failure with epinephrine. It was not possible to determine whether epinephrine in addition to selective β2-agonist improved outcomes. CONCLUSION The low-quality evidence available suggests that epinephrine and selective β2-agonists have similar efficacy in acute asthma. There is a need for high-quality double-blind RCTs to determine whether addition of intramuscular epinephrine to inhaled or nebulised selective β2-agonist improves outcome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017079472.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute asthma agonist and low quality: 1
- acute asthma agonist and low quality evidence: 1
- acute asthma and adrenaline administration: 1, 2
- acute asthma and low quality: 1, 2
- acute asthma and low quality evidence: 1
- acute asthma exacerbation and adrenaline administration: 1, 2
- acute asthma exacerbation and low quality: 1, 2
- acute asthma exacerbation and low quality evidence: 1
- acute asthma exacerbation route and adrenaline administration: 1
- acute asthma exacerbation route and low quality: 1
- acute asthma exacerbation route and low quality evidence: 1
- acute asthma similar efficacy and adrenaline administration: 1
- acute asthma similar efficacy and low quality: 1
- acute asthma similar efficacy and low quality evidence: 1
- adrenaline administration and low quality evidence: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date