Selected article for: "aggressive treatment and clinical practice"

Author: Wang, Xing-Wang; Hu, Hao; Xu, Zhi-Yong; Zhang, Gong-Kai; Yu, Qing-Hua; Yang, Hui-Lan; Zheng, Ji-Hua
Title: Association of menopausal status with COVID-19 outcomes: a propensity score matching analysis
  • Cord-id: koxflsur
  • Document date: 2021_1_29
  • ID: koxflsur
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Despite the growing number of studies on the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), little is known about the association of menopausal status with COVID-19 outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 336 COVID-19 inpatients between February 15, 2020 and April 30, 2020 at the Taikang Tongji Hospital (Wuhan), China. Electronic medical records including patient demographics, laboratory results, and chest computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed. RESULTS:
    Document: BACKGROUND: Despite the growing number of studies on the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), little is known about the association of menopausal status with COVID-19 outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 336 COVID-19 inpatients between February 15, 2020 and April 30, 2020 at the Taikang Tongji Hospital (Wuhan), China. Electronic medical records including patient demographics, laboratory results, and chest computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 300 patients with complete clinical outcomes were included for analysis. The mean age was 65.3 years, and most patients were women (n = 167, 55.7%). Over 50% of patients presented with comorbidities, with hypertension (63.5%) being the most common comorbidity. After propensity score matching, results showed that men had significantly higher odds than premenopausal women for developing severe disease type (23.7% vs. 0%, OR 17.12, 95% CI 1.00–293.60; p = 0.003) and bilateral lung infiltration (86.1% vs. 64.7%, OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.08–10.64; p = 0.04), but not for mortality (2.0% vs. 0%, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.04–19.12, p = 1.00). However, non-significant difference was observed among men and postmenopausal women in the percentage of severe disease type (32.7% vs. 41.7%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.37–1.24, p = 0.21), bilateral lung infiltration (86.1% vs. 91.7%, OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.22–1.47, p = 0.24), and mortality (2.0% vs. 6.0%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.06–1.69, p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Men had higher disease severity than premenopausal women, while the differences disappeared between postmenopausal women and men. These findings support aggressive treatment for the poor prognosis of postmenopausal women in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-021-00363-6.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • admission rate and low mortality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • admission rate and low mortality rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • admission rate and lung imaging: 1
    • admission rate and lung infiltration: 1
    • long term effect and low mortality: 1, 2
    • low mortality and lung imaging: 1, 2, 3