Author: Taniguchi, Yuta; Miyawaki, Atsushi; Tsugawa, Yusuke; Murayama, Hiroshi; Tamiya, Nanako; Tabuchi, Takahiro
Title: Family caregiving and changes in mental health status in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic Cord-id: nm645la5 Document date: 2021_9_17
ID: nm645la5
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a widespread significant impact on mental health. However, the effect of providing care to family members (informal caregiving) on changes in mental health status during the pandemic remains unclear. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from a large internet survey conducted between August and September 2020, we investigated the association of informal caregiving status with the incidence of mental health deterioration (increase
Document: BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a widespread significant impact on mental health. However, the effect of providing care to family members (informal caregiving) on changes in mental health status during the pandemic remains unclear. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from a large internet survey conducted between August and September 2020, we investigated the association of informal caregiving status with the incidence of mental health deterioration (increased loneliness, self-reported deterioration in mental health, and new suicidal ideation) in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Among 25,482 participants (mean age 48.8 [standard deviation 17.3]; 50.3% women), 2,500 (9.8%) were providing informal care during the pandemic. After adjusting for potential confounders, informal caregivers were more likely than non-caregivers to experience increased loneliness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–2.76), self-reported deterioration in mental health (aOR 1.54; 95% CI 1.14–2.08), and new incidence of suicidal ideation (aOR 3.65; 95% CI 1.92–6.92). The degree of mental health deterioration depended on the intensity of care. For example, the incidence rates of new suicidal ideation were 15.0%, 5.2%, and 3.6% for individuals who provided high-intensity caregiving, those who provided low-intensity caregiving, and non-caregivers, respectively (p-for-trend<0.001). The stratified analysis by gender showed that informal caregiving was associated with self-reported deterioration in mental health status among women (aOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.49–3.21) but not men (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 0.75–1.56). CONCLUSION: Informal caregivers were more likely to experience mental health deterioration than non-caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- adjusted odd and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- adjusted odd ratio and live people: 1
- adjusted odd ratio and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- adjusted rate and live people: 1
- adjusted rate and living conditions: 1, 2, 3
- adjusted rate and logistic regression model: 1
- adjustment variable and live people: 1
- live people and living conditions: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- live people and lockdown situation: 1
- live people and logistic regression model: 1
- living conditions and lockdown isolation: 1
- living conditions and lockdown situation: 1, 2
- living conditions and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date