Author: Goyal, R.
Title: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Detection in Computed Tomography Scans Through Cost-Sensitive Machine Learning Cord-id: ab0sb7i3 Document date: 2021_10_22
ID: ab0sb7i3
Snippet: Intracerebral hemorrhage is the most severe form of stroke, with a greater than 75% likelihood of death or severe disability, and half of its mortality occurs in the first 24 hours. Despite the grave nature of intracerebral hemorrhage and the high cost of false negatives in its diagnosis, only one study to date has implemented cost-sensitive techniques to minimize false negatives -- even as cost-sensitive learning has shown promise in other fields. In this study, 6 machine learning models were t
Document: Intracerebral hemorrhage is the most severe form of stroke, with a greater than 75% likelihood of death or severe disability, and half of its mortality occurs in the first 24 hours. Despite the grave nature of intracerebral hemorrhage and the high cost of false negatives in its diagnosis, only one study to date has implemented cost-sensitive techniques to minimize false negatives -- even as cost-sensitive learning has shown promise in other fields. In this study, 6 machine learning models were trained on 160 computed tomography brain scans both with and without utility matrices based on penalization -- an implementation of cost-sensitive learning. The highest-performing model obtained an accuracy of 97.5%, sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 100% without penalization, and an accuracy of 92.5%, sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 85% with penalization, on a dataset of 40 scans. In both cases, the model outperforms a range of previous work using other techniques despite the small size of, and high heterogeneity in, the dataset. Utility matrices demonstrate strong potential for sensitive yet accurate artificial intelligence techniques in medical contexts and workflows where a reduction of false negatives is crucial.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurate model and machine model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- logistic regression and machine model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date