Selected article for: "methodological quality and treatment adherence"

Author: Tinoco, Juliana de Melo Vellozo Pereira; Figueiredo, Lyvia da Silva; Flores, Paula Vanessa Peclat; de Padua, Bruna Lins Rocha; Mesquita, Evandro Tinoco; Cavalcanti, Ana Carla Dantas
Title: Effectiveness of health education in the self-care and adherence of patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis
  • Cord-id: c0gpkv8p
  • Document date: 2021_7_19
  • ID: c0gpkv8p
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: to evaluate in the literature the effectiveness of the health education interventions in self-care and adherence to treatment of patients with Chronic Heart Failure. METHOD: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Studies were selected that compared health education interventions with the usual care to assess the outcomes of adherence and self-care. The quality of the methodological evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.
    Document: OBJECTIVE: to evaluate in the literature the effectiveness of the health education interventions in self-care and adherence to treatment of patients with Chronic Heart Failure. METHOD: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Studies were selected that compared health education interventions with the usual care to assess the outcomes of adherence and self-care. The quality of the methodological evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: the educational interventions were more effective in relation to the usual care in the outcome of adherence (fixed effect=0-3841; p-value <0.001). There was no statistical difference in the outcome of self-care (fixed effect=0.0063; p-value=0.898). CONCLUSION: the educational interventions improved the outcome of adherence, though not self-care in the patient with Heart Failure.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute heart failure and low quality: 1, 2
    • adequate guidance and adherence lack: 1
    • adherence lack and low health literacy: 1
    • adherence lack and low self efficacy: 1
    • adherence outcome and local care: 1, 2
    • adherence outcome and low quality: 1
    • adherence score and low quality: 1
    • local care and low consider: 1
    • local care and low quality: 1, 2, 3