Author: José G B Derraik; William A Anderson; Elisabeth A Connelly; Yvonne C Anderson
Title: Rapid evidence summary on SARS-CoV-2 survivorship and disinfection, and a reusable PPE protocol using a double-hit process Document date: 2020_4_6
ID: d48u5w0h_42
Snippet: • Based on the available evidence, there are uncertainties about using our recommended heat treatment at 60°C for 90 minutes for N95 FFRs, as the extended time required for heat treatment may have adverse effects that could compromise its safety for reuse, especially after multiple disinfection cycles. However, a recent report by Liao et al. 41 suggests that our proposed heat treatment regimen could be applied to N95 FFRs, and could therefore .....
Document: • Based on the available evidence, there are uncertainties about using our recommended heat treatment at 60°C for 90 minutes for N95 FFRs, as the extended time required for heat treatment may have adverse effects that could compromise its safety for reuse, especially after multiple disinfection cycles. However, a recent report by Liao et al. 41 suggests that our proposed heat treatment regimen could be applied to N95 FFRs, and could therefore be adopted in the absence of UVC treatment.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- adverse effect and heat treatment: 1
- adverse effect and recent report: 1, 2
- available evidence and extended time: 1
- available evidence and recent report: 1, 2, 3
- disinfection cycle and heat treatment: 1
- extended time and recent report: 1
- heat treatment and recommend heat treatment: 1
- heat treatment and UVC treatment: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date