Author: Arnold, D. T.; Attwood, M.; Barratt, S.; Elvers, K.; Morley, A.; McKernon, J.; Oates, A.; Donald, C.; Noel, A.; MacGowan, A.; Maskell, N. A.; Hamilton, F.
Title: Blood parameters measured on admission as predictors of outcome for COVID-19; a prospective UK cohort study Cord-id: 50ovfwvo Document date: 2020_6_29
ID: 50ovfwvo
Snippet: Abstract: Introduction: COVID-19 has an unpredictable clinical course so prognostic biomarkers would be invaluable when triaging patients on admission to hospital. Many biomarkers have been suggested using large observational datasets but sample timing is crucial to ensure prognostic relevance. The DISCOVER study prospectively recruited patients with COVID-19 admitted to a UK hospital and analysed a panel of putative prognostic biomarkers on the admission blood sample to identify markers of poor
Document: Abstract: Introduction: COVID-19 has an unpredictable clinical course so prognostic biomarkers would be invaluable when triaging patients on admission to hospital. Many biomarkers have been suggested using large observational datasets but sample timing is crucial to ensure prognostic relevance. The DISCOVER study prospectively recruited patients with COVID-19 admitted to a UK hospital and analysed a panel of putative prognostic biomarkers on the admission blood sample to identify markers of poor outcome. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to hospital with proven or clinicoradiological suspected COVID-19 were recruited. Admission bloods were extracted from the clinical laboratory. A panel of biomarkers (IL-6, suPAR, KL-6, Troponin, Ferritin, LDH, BNP, Procalcitonin) were performed in addition to routinely performed markers (CRP, neutrophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio). Age, NEWS score and CURB-65 were included as comparators. All biomarkers were tested in logistic regression against a composite outcome of non-invasive ventilation, intensive care admission, or death, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) figures calculated. Results: 155 patients had 28-day outcomes at the time of analysis. CRP (AUC 0.51 ,CI:0.40-0.62), lymphocyte count (AUC 0.62 ,CI:0.51-0.72), and other routine markers did not predict the primary outcome. IL-6 (AUC: 0.78,0.65-0.89) and suPAR (AUC 0.77 ,CI: 0.66-0.85) showed some promise, but simple clinical features alone such as NEWS score (AUC: 0.74 ,0.64-0.83) or age (AUC: 0.70 ,0.61-0.78) performed nearly as well. Discussion: Admission blood biomarkers have only moderate predictive value for predicting COVID-19 outcomes, while simple clinical features such as age and NEWS score outperform many biomarkers. IL-6 and suPAR had the best performance, and further studies should validate these biomarkers in a prospective fashion.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute phase response and lung disease: 1
- acute phase response and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3
- acute phase response and lymphocyte ratio: 1
- additional role and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- additional role and logistic regression model: 1
- additional role and lung disease: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- additional role and lung pathology: 1, 2
- additional value and admission blood: 1, 2, 3
- additional value and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- additional value and logistic regression model: 1, 2
- additional value and lung disease: 1
- additional value and lymphocyte count: 1, 2
- additional value and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2
- additional value and lymphocyte ratio: 1, 2
- admission blood and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54
- admission blood and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- admission blood and long term outcome: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date