Author: Zavlis, Orestis; Butter, Sarah; Bennett, Kate; Hartman, Todd K.; Hyland, Philip; Mason, Liam; McBride, Orla; Murphy, Jamie; Gibson-Miller, Jilly; Levita, Liat; Martinez, Anton P.; Shevlin, Mark; Stocks, Thomas V. A.; Vallières, Frédérique; Bentall, Richard P.
Title: How does the COVID-19 pandemic impact on population mental health? A network analysis of COVID influences on depression, anxiety and traumatic stress in the UK population Cord-id: mk6oe10d Document date: 2021_3_16
ID: mk6oe10d
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency has led to numerous attempts to assess the impact of the pandemic on population mental health. The findings indicate an increase in depression and anxiety but have been limited by the lack of specificity about which aspects of the pandemic (e.g. viral exposure or economic threats) have led to adverse mental health outcomes. METHODS: Network analyses were conducted on data from wave 1 (N = 2025, recruited 23 March–28 March 2020) and
Document: BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency has led to numerous attempts to assess the impact of the pandemic on population mental health. The findings indicate an increase in depression and anxiety but have been limited by the lack of specificity about which aspects of the pandemic (e.g. viral exposure or economic threats) have led to adverse mental health outcomes. METHODS: Network analyses were conducted on data from wave 1 (N = 2025, recruited 23 March–28 March 2020) and wave 2 (N = 1406, recontacts 22 April–1 May 2020) of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium Study, an online longitudinal survey of a representative sample of the UK adult population. Our models included depression (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety (GAD-7) and trauma symptoms (ITQ); and measures of COVID-specific anxiety, exposure to the virus in self and close others, as well as economic loss due to the pandemic. RESULTS: A mixed graphical model at wave 1 identified a potential pathway from economic adversity to anxiety symptoms via COVID-specific anxiety. There was no association between viral exposure and symptoms. Ising network models using clinical cut-offs for symptom scores at each wave yielded similar findings, with the exception of a modest effect of viral exposure on trauma symptoms at wave 1 only. Anxiety and depression symptoms formed separate clusters at wave 1 but not wave 2. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological impact of the pandemic evolved in the early phase of lockdown. COVID-related anxiety may represent the mechanism through which economic consequences of the pandemic are associated with psychiatric symptoms.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and longitudinal survey: 1
- account consistent and logistic regression: 1
- accuracy stability and logistic regression: 1
- adjacency matrix and logistic regression: 1
- living environment and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- living environment and longitudinal study: 1
- lockdown month and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- lockdown month and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- lockdown month and longitudinal survey: 1
- lockdown week and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- lockdown week and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- lockdown week and longitudinal survey: 1, 2
- logistic regression and longitudinal multi country survey: 1
- logistic regression and longitudinal study: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and longitudinal survey: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression and lost income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- longitudinal study and lost income: 1, 2, 3, 4
- longitudinal survey and lost income: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date