Selected article for: "lung ultrasound and lus assessment"

Author: Emanuele, Pivetta; Alberto, Goffi; Maria, Tizzani; Stefania M, Locatelli; Giulio, Porrino; Isabel, Losano; Dario, Leone; Gilberto, Calzolari; Matteo, Vesan; Fabio, Steri; Ardito, Arianna; Marialessia, Capuano; Maria, Gelardi; Giulia, Silvestri; Stefania, Dutto; Maria, Avolio; Rossana, Cavallo; Alice, Bartalucci; Cristina, Paglieri; Fulvio, Morello; Lorenzo, Richiardi; Milena M, Maule; Enrico, Lupia
Title: Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in the Emergency Department
  • Cord-id: ap72gg3x
  • Document date: 2020_10_13
  • ID: ap72gg3x
    Snippet: Objective Accurate diagnostic testing to identify SARS–CoV-2 infection is critical. Although highly specific, SARS–CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), has shown, in clinical practice, to be affected by a non-insignificant proportion of false negative results. The study sought to explore whether the integration of lung ultrasound (LUS) with clinical evaluation is associated with increased sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, and therefore may facili
    Document: Objective Accurate diagnostic testing to identify SARS–CoV-2 infection is critical. Although highly specific, SARS–CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), has shown, in clinical practice, to be affected by a non-insignificant proportion of false negative results. The study sought to explore whether the integration of lung ultrasound (LUS) with clinical evaluation is associated with increased sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, and therefore may facilitate the identification of false negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results. Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive adult patients with symptoms potentially related to SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the emergency department (ED) of an Italian academic hospital. Immediately after the initial assessment, a LUS evaluation was performed and the likelihood SARS-CoV-2 infection, based on both clinical and LUS findings (“integrated” assessment), was recorded. RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 detection was subsequently performed. Results We enrolled 228 patients; 107 patients (46.9%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of the clinical-LUS integrated assessment were higher than first RT-PCR [94.4% (95% CI 88.2-97.9), vs. 80.4% (95% CI 71.6-87.4); 95% (95% CI 89.5-98.2), vs. 85.2% (95% CI 78.3-90.6)]. Among the 142 patients who initially had negative RT-PCR, 21 resulted positive at a subsequent molecular test performed within 72 hours. All these false negative cases were correctly identified by the integrated assessment. Conclusion This study suggests that, in patients presenting to the ED with symptoms commonly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the integration of LUS with clinical evaluation has high sensitivity and specificity for COVID-19 pneumonia and it may help to identify false negative results occurring with RT-PCR.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute difference and acute heart failure: 1
    • absolute difference and acute respiratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • absolute difference and acute symptom: 1
    • absolute difference and lung ultrasound: 1
    • absolute difference and lus lung ultrasound: 1
    • accuracy difference and acute respiratory: 1
    • acute heart failure and lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3
    • acute heart failure and lus lung ultrasound: 1
    • acute respiratory and low respiratory tract: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • acute respiratory and lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and lus evaluation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • acute respiratory and lus examination: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory and lus finding: 1
    • acute respiratory and lus implementation: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory and lus lung ultrasound: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and lus perform: 1, 2
    • lung ultrasound and lus evaluation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • lung ultrasound and lus examination: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
    • lung ultrasound and lus expertise: 1