Selected article for: "ablation margin and adequate ablation margin"

Author: Takeyama, Nobuyuki; Mizobuchi, Naruki; Sakaki, Masashi; Shimozuma, Yu; Munechika, Jiro; Kajiwara, Atsushi; Uchikoshi, Manabu; Uozumi, Syojiro; Ohgiya, Yoshimitsu; Gokan, Takehiko
Title: Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images.
  • Cord-id: p3z3ush0
  • Document date: 2019_1_1
  • ID: p3z3ush0
    Snippet: PURPOSE To retrospectively evaluate the utility of fusion images of pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase (HBP) series to assess the ablation margins after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Additionally, to identify factors indicative of an adequate ablation margin and predictors of local tumor progression (LTP). METHODS Fifty-nine HCCs in 29 patients were treated by RFA and followed-up for > 1 year (mean 37.9 months). Fusion images of pre- and post-ablation
    Document: PURPOSE To retrospectively evaluate the utility of fusion images of pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase (HBP) series to assess the ablation margins after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Additionally, to identify factors indicative of an adequate ablation margin and predictors of local tumor progression (LTP). METHODS Fifty-nine HCCs in 29 patients were treated by RFA and followed-up for > 1 year (mean 37.9 months). Fusion images of pre- and post-ablation HBP series were created using a non-rigid registration and manual correlation. The ablation margin appearance was classified as ablation margin + (ablation margin completely surrounding the tumor), ablation margin-zero (a partially discontinuous ablation margin without protrusion of HCC), ablation margin-(a partially discontinuous ablation margin with protrusion of HCC), and indeterminate (index tumor was not visible). The minimal ablation margin was measured, and clinical factors were examined to identify other risk factors for LTP. RESULTS LTP was observed at follow-up in 12 tumors. The mean minimal ablation margin was 3.6 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed that the ablation margin status was the only significant factor (p = 0.028). The cumulative LTP rates (3.3%, 3.3%, and 3.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively) in 30 ablation margin + nodules were significantly lower (p = 0.006) than those (20.0%, 28.0%, and 32.2% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively) in 25 ablation margin-zero nodules. CONCLUSIONS Fusion images enable an early assessment of the ablation efficacy in the majority of HCCs. The ablation margin status is a significant factor for LTP.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • ablation efficacy and ltp risk factor: 1
    • ablation margin and adequate ablation margin: 1, 2
    • ablation margin and local tumor progression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • ablation margin and ltp risk factor: 1
    • local tumor progression and ltp risk factor: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • local tumor progression and ltp significant factor: 1, 2