Selected article for: "activity level and low physical"

Author: Smith, Lee; Jacob, Louis; Butler, Laurie; Schuch, Felipe; Barnett, Yvonne; Grabovac, Igor; Veronese, Nicola; Caperchione, Cristina; Lopez-Sanchez, Guillermo F; Meyer, Jacob; Abufaraj, Mohammad; Yakkundi, Anita; Armstrong, Nicola; Tully, Mark A
Title: Prevalence and correlates of physical activity in a sample of UK adults observing social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Cord-id: coih174d
  • Document date: 2020_7_1
  • ID: coih174d
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the levels and correlates of physical activity during COVID-19 social distancing in a sample of the UK public. METHODS: This paper presents analyses of data from a cross-sectional study. Levels of physical activity during COVID-19 social distancing were self-reported. Participants also reported on sociodemographic and clinical data. The association between several factors and physical activity was studied using regression models. RESULTS: Nine hundred and eleven adults
    Document: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the levels and correlates of physical activity during COVID-19 social distancing in a sample of the UK public. METHODS: This paper presents analyses of data from a cross-sectional study. Levels of physical activity during COVID-19 social distancing were self-reported. Participants also reported on sociodemographic and clinical data. The association between several factors and physical activity was studied using regression models. RESULTS: Nine hundred and eleven adults were included (64.0% were women and 50.4% of the participants were aged 35–64 years). 75.0% of the participants met the physical activity guidelines during social distancing. Meeting these guidelines during social distancing was significantly associated with sex (reference: male; female: OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.33), age (reference: 18–34 years; ≥65 years: OR=4.11, 95% CI 2.01 to 8.92), annual household income (reference: <£15 000; £15 000–<£25 000: OR=2.03, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.76; £25 000–<£40 000: OR=3.16, 95% CI 1.68 to 6.04; £40 000–<£60 000: OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.34; ≥£60 000: OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.09), level of physical activity per day when not observing social distancing (OR=1.00 (per 1 min increase), 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01), and any physical symptom experienced during social distancing (reference: no; yes: OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.46). CONCLUSION: During COVID-19, social distancing interventions should focus on increasing physical activity levels among younger adults, men and those with low annual household income. It should be noted in the present sample that women and younger adults are over-represented.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • access open and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • access open and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • activity level and acute exercise: 1
    • activity level and adequate level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • activity level and adjuvant immune system: 1
    • activity level and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
    • activity level and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute exercise and logistic regression: 1
    • adequate level and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • adequate level and logistic regression analysis: 1