Author: Mansfield, Karen L.; Newby, Danielle; Soneson, Emma; Vaci, Nemanja; Jindra, Christoph; Geulayov, Galit; Gallacher, John; Fazel, Mina
Title: COVIDâ€19 partial school closures and mental health problems: A crossâ€sectional survey of 11,000 adolescents to determine those most at risk Cord-id: avqqud6f Document date: 2021_7_20
ID: avqqud6f
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Understanding adolescents' mental health during lockdown and identifying those most at risk is an urgent public health challenge. This study surveyed school pupils across Southern England during the first COVIDâ€19 school lockdown to investigate situational factors associated with mental health difficulties and how they relate to pupils' access to inâ€school educational provision. METHODS: A total of 11,765 pupils in years 8–13 completed a survey in June–July 2020, including qu
Document: BACKGROUND: Understanding adolescents' mental health during lockdown and identifying those most at risk is an urgent public health challenge. This study surveyed school pupils across Southern England during the first COVIDâ€19 school lockdown to investigate situational factors associated with mental health difficulties and how they relate to pupils' access to inâ€school educational provision. METHODS: A total of 11,765 pupils in years 8–13 completed a survey in June–July 2020, including questions on mental health, risk indicators and access to school provision. Pupils at home were compared to those accessing inâ€school provision on risk and contextual factors and mental health outcomes. Multilevel logistic regression analyses compared the effect of eight risk and contextual factors, including access to inâ€school provision, on depression, anxiety and selfâ€reported deterioration in mental wellbeing. RESULTS: Females, pupils who had experienced food poverty and those who had previously accessed mental health support were at greatest risk of depression, anxiety and a deterioration in wellbeing. Pupils whose parents were going out to work and those preparing for national examinations in the subsequent school year were also at increased risk. Pupils accessing inâ€school provision had poorer mental health, but this was accounted for by the background risk and contextual factors assessed, in line with the allocation of inâ€school places to more vulnerable pupils. CONCLUSIONS: Although the strongest associations with poor mental health during school closures were established risk factors, further contextual factors of particular relevance during lockdown had negative impacts on wellbeing. Identifying those pupils at greatest risk for poor outcomes is critical for ensuring that appropriate educational and social support can be given to pupils either at home or inâ€school during subsequent lockdowns.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date