Author: Chudiik, A.; Pesaran, M. H.; Rebucci, A.
Title: COVID-19 Time-varying Reproduction Numbers Worldwide: An Empirical Analysis of Mandatory and Voluntary Social Distancing Cord-id: cxnwlroy Document date: 2021_4_7
ID: cxnwlroy
Snippet: This paper estimates time-varying COVID-19 reproduction numbers worldwide solely based on the number of reported infected cases, allowing for under-reporting. Estimation is based on a moment condition that can be derived from an agent-based stochastic network model of COVID-19 transmission. The outcomes in terms of the reproduction number and the trajectory of per-capita cases through the end of 2020 are very diverse. The reproduction number depends on the transmission rate and the proportion of
Document: This paper estimates time-varying COVID-19 reproduction numbers worldwide solely based on the number of reported infected cases, allowing for under-reporting. Estimation is based on a moment condition that can be derived from an agent-based stochastic network model of COVID-19 transmission. The outcomes in terms of the reproduction number and the trajectory of per-capita cases through the end of 2020 are very diverse. The reproduction number depends on the transmission rate and the proportion of susceptible population, or the herd immunity effect. Changes in the transmission rate depends on changes in the behaviour of the virus, reflecting mutations and vaccinations, and changes in people's behaviour, reflecting voluntary or government mandated isolation. Over our sample period, neither mutation not vaccination are major factors, so one can attribute variation in the transmission rate to variations in behaviour. Evidence based on panel data models explaining transmission rates for nine European countries indicates that the diversity of outcomes resulted from the non-linear interaction of mandatory containment measures, voluntary precautionary isolation, and the economic incentives that governments provided to support isolation. These effects are precisely estimated and robust to various assumptions. As a result, countries with seemingly different social distancing policies achieved quite similar outcomes in terms of the reproduction number. These results imply that ignoring the voluntary component of social distancing could introduce an upward bias in the estimates of the effects of lock-downs and support policies on the transmission rates.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- active case and additional factor: 1
- active infected and additional factor: 1
- additional challenge and address policy: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date