Selected article for: "antibody titer and disease onset"

Author: Liu, Miao; Chen, Zhen; Dai, Meng‐Yuan; Yang, Jun‐Hui; Chen, Xiao‐Bing; Chen, Di; You, Hua; Guo, Xin; Leng, Yan; Yu, Li; Zhang, Meng‐Li; Wu, Xian; Yang, Junyu; Gao, Chong; Tenen, Daniel G; Chai, Li; Ai, Fen
Title: Lessons learned from early compassionate use of convalescent plasma on critically ill patients with Covid‐19
  • Cord-id: bc3jvlto
  • Document date: 2020_8_8
  • ID: bc3jvlto
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: The management of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by a new human virus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), is challenging. Recently, there have been several reports with inconsistent results after treatment with convalescent plasma (CP) on critically ill patients with COVID‐19, which was produced with a neutralizing antibody titer and tested in a P3 or P4 laboratory. However, due to the limitation of the condi
    Document: BACKGROUND: The management of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by a new human virus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), is challenging. Recently, there have been several reports with inconsistent results after treatment with convalescent plasma (CP) on critically ill patients with COVID‐19, which was produced with a neutralizing antibody titer and tested in a P3 or P4 laboratory. However, due to the limitation of the conditions on mass production of plasma, most producers hardly had the capability to isolate the neutralizing antibody. Here, we report the clinical courses of three critically ill patients with COVID‐19 receiving CP treatments by total immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer collection. METHODS: Three patients with COVID‐19 in this study were laboratory confirmed to be positive for SARS‐CoV‐2, with radiographic and clinical features of pneumonia. CP was collected by total IgG titer of 160 (range, 200‐225 mL), and patients were transfused between 20 and 30 days after disease onset at the critical illness stage as a trial in addition to standard care. The clinical courses of these patients, including laboratory results and pulmonary functional and image studies after receiving convalescent plasma infusions, were reviewed. RESULTS: No therapeutic effect of CP was observed in any of the patients; instead, all three patients deteriorated and required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment. A potential cytokine storm 4 hours after infusion of CP in Patient 2 was observed. No more patients were put on the trial of CP transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend extreme caution in using CP in critically ill patients more than 2 weeks after the onset of COVID‐19 pneumonia.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute lung injury and liver failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • acute lung injury and local hospital: 1
    • acute lung injury and lung dynamic compliance: 1
    • acute lung injury and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute lung injury and lung oxygenation index: 1
    • acute phase and administration collection: 1
    • acute phase and liver failure: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute phase and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute phase and lymphocyte number: 1
    • additional treatment option and lung injury: 1
    • administration collection and local hospital: 1
    • liver failure and lung injury: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • local hospital and lung injury: 1, 2
    • lung injury and lymphocyte number: 1