Author: Gashi, Andi; Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.; Chatzaraki, Vasiliki; Potempa, Anna; Rauch, Franziska; Grbic, Sasa; Wiggli, Benedikt; Friedl, Andrée; Niemann, Tilo
Title: Detection and characterization of COVID-19 findings in chest CT: Feasibility and applicability of an AI-based software tool Cord-id: jgrvmo2e Document date: 2021_10_15
ID: jgrvmo2e
Snippet: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged institutions’ diagnostic processes worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software tool that automatically evaluates chest computed tomography for findings of suspected COVID-19. Two groups were retrospectively evaluated for COVID-19-associated ground glass opacities of the lungs (group A: real-time polymerase chain reaction positive COVID patients, n = 108; group B: asymptomatic pre-operative
Document: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged institutions’ diagnostic processes worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software tool that automatically evaluates chest computed tomography for findings of suspected COVID-19. Two groups were retrospectively evaluated for COVID-19-associated ground glass opacities of the lungs (group A: real-time polymerase chain reaction positive COVID patients, n = 108; group B: asymptomatic pre-operative group, n = 88). The performance of an AI-based software assessment tool for detection of COVID-associated abnormalities was compared with human evaluation based on COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO-RADS) scores performed by 3 readers. All evaluated variables of the AI-based assessment showed significant differences between the 2 groups (P < .01). The inter-reader reliability of CO-RADS scoring was 0.87. The CO-RADS scores were substantially higher in group A (mean 4.28) than group B (mean 1.50). The difference between CO-RADS scoring and AI assessment was statistically significant for all variables but showed good correlation with the clinical context of the CO-RADS score. AI allowed to predict COVID positive cases with an accuracy of 0.94. The evaluated AI-based algorithm detects COVID-19-associated findings with high sensitivity and may support radiologic workflows during the pandemic.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy auc and lung opacity: 1
- accuracy auc and lung volume: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy auc and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- accurate diagnosis and acute phase: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- accurate diagnosis and low percentage: 1
- accurate diagnosis and low specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accurate diagnosis and low suspicion: 1
- accurate diagnosis and lung abnormality: 1
- accurate diagnosis and lung tissue: 1, 2, 3
- accurate diagnosis and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
- acquire image and machine learning: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date