Author: Chowdhury, Nihad Karim; Kabir, Muhammad Ashad; Rahman, Md. Muhtadir
Title: An Ensemble-based Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method for COVID-19 Cough Classification Cord-id: qvevgju8 Document date: 2021_10_1
ID: qvevgju8
Snippet: The objectives of this research are analysing the performance of the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques for classifying COVID-19 from cough sound and identifying the model(s) that consistently perform well across different cough datasets. Different performance evaluation metrics (such as precision, sensitivity, specificity, AUC, accuracy, etc.) make it difficult to select the best performance model. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose an ensemble-based multi-criteria decis
Document: The objectives of this research are analysing the performance of the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques for classifying COVID-19 from cough sound and identifying the model(s) that consistently perform well across different cough datasets. Different performance evaluation metrics (such as precision, sensitivity, specificity, AUC, accuracy, etc.) make it difficult to select the best performance model. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose an ensemble-based multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method for selecting top performance machine learning technique(s) for COVID-19 cough classification. We use four cough datasets, namely Cambridge, Coswara, Virufy, and NoCoCoDa to verify the proposed method. At first, our proposed method uses the audio features of cough samples and then applies machine learning (ML) techniques to classify them as COVID-19 or non-COVID-19. Then, we consider a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method that combines ensemble technologies (i.e., soft and hard) to select the best model. In MCDM, we use the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for ranking purposes, while entropy is applied to calculate evaluation criteria weights. In addition, we apply the feature reduction process through recursive feature elimination with cross-validation under different estimators. The results of our empirical evaluations show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art models.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acc accuracy and logistic regression: 1, 2
- accuracy auc and adaptive boosting: 1
- accuracy auc and additive model: 1
- accuracy auc and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accuracy auc and loss function: 1, 2, 3
- adaboost adaptive boosting and adaptive boosting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- adaboost adaptive boosting and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
- adaptive boosting and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4
- additive model and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- logistic regression and loss function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- logistic regression and low dimensional: 1
- loss function and low dimensional: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date