Author: Harris, Whitney C; Usseglio, John; Chapman-Rodriguez, Rose; Licursi, Maureen; Larson, Elaine
Title: A Scoping Review of Validated Tools to Measure Incivility in Healthcare Settings. Cord-id: od684vu5 Document date: 2019_1_1
ID: od684vu5
Snippet: OBJECTIVE To identify and compare validated tools used to assess incivility in healthcare settings. BACKGROUND Incivility in the workforce is associated with poor quality outcomes, increased employee turnover, and decreased job satisfaction. Validated tools are essential for accurate measurement of incivility. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of validated tools for use in a busy clinical setting. METHODS In a scoping review, English language research studies using incivility
Document: OBJECTIVE To identify and compare validated tools used to assess incivility in healthcare settings. BACKGROUND Incivility in the workforce is associated with poor quality outcomes, increased employee turnover, and decreased job satisfaction. Validated tools are essential for accurate measurement of incivility. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of validated tools for use in a busy clinical setting. METHODS In a scoping review, English language research studies using incivility tools published in PubMed or CINAHL between March 1, 2013, and March 14, 2018, were assessed for sound psychometric properties and feasibility of use (eg, short, easy to administer). RESULTS After screening 869 articles and full text review of 244, 5 identified tools met the criteria; the Short Negative Acts Questionnaire seemed best suited for use in a busy healthcare setting. CONCLUSION Adoption of a standardized and validated incivility tool makes it possible to compare across clinical settings and track progress over time.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date