Author: Saleem, Muhammad Hammad; Potgieter, Johan; Arif, Khalid Mahmood
Title: Plant Disease Classification: A Comparative Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks and Deep Learning Optimizers Cord-id: nzftj3wf Document date: 2020_10_6
ID: nzftj3wf
Snippet: Recently, plant disease classification has been done by various state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) architectures on the publicly available/author generated datasets. This research proposed the deep learning-based comparative evaluation for the classification of plant disease in two steps. Firstly, the best convolutional neural network (CNN) was obtained by conducting a comparative analysis among well-known CNN architectures along with modified and cascaded/hybrid versions of some of the DL mode
Document: Recently, plant disease classification has been done by various state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) architectures on the publicly available/author generated datasets. This research proposed the deep learning-based comparative evaluation for the classification of plant disease in two steps. Firstly, the best convolutional neural network (CNN) was obtained by conducting a comparative analysis among well-known CNN architectures along with modified and cascaded/hybrid versions of some of the DL models proposed in the recent researches. Secondly, the performance of the best-obtained model was attempted to improve by training through various deep learning optimizers. The comparison between various CNNs was based on performance metrics such as validation accuracy/loss, F1-score, and the required number of epochs. All the selected DL architectures were trained in the PlantVillage dataset which contains 26 different diseases belonging to 14 respective plant species. Keras with TensorFlow backend was used to train deep learning architectures. It is concluded that the Xception architecture trained with the Adam optimizer attained the highest validation accuracy and F1-score of 99.81% and 0.9978 respectively which is comparatively better than the previous approaches and it proves the novelty of the work. Therefore, the method proposed in this research can be applied to other agricultural applications for transparent detection and classification purposes.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- adam adadelta and adaptive moment: 1
- adam adadelta and adaptive moment estimation method: 1
- adam adadelta and loss accuracy: 1
- adam adadelta and machine learning: 1
- adam optimizer and adaptive moment: 1
- adam optimizer and machine learning: 1, 2
- adaptive learning rate and loss accuracy: 1
- adaptive learning rate and machine learning: 1, 2, 3
- adaptive moment and loss accuracy: 1
- adaptive moment and machine learning: 1, 2
- adaptive moment estimation method and loss accuracy: 1
- adaptive moment estimation method and machine learning: 1
- loss accuracy and low number: 1
- loss accuracy and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- low number and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date