Selected article for: "academic ed and active cancer"

Author: Zattra, Ottavia; Fraga, Anthony; Lu, Nancy; Gee, Michael S.; Liu, Raymond W.; Lev, Michael H.; Brink, James A.; Saini, Sanjay; Lang, Min; Succi, Marc D.
Title: Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
  • Cord-id: emk9alp3
  • Document date: 2021_8_6
  • ID: emk9alp3
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as follows: pre‐COVID‐19 (1/5/20–3/14/20), COVID‐19 peak (3/15/20–5/2/20), and post‐COVID‐19 peak (5/3/20–11/14/20). 15 March 2020 was the day a state of emergency was declared in MA;
    Document: BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as follows: pre‐COVID‐19 (1/5/20–3/14/20), COVID‐19 peak (3/15/20–5/2/20), and post‐COVID‐19 peak (5/3/20–11/14/20). 15 March 2020 was the day a state of emergency was declared in MA; 3 May 2020 was the day our hospitals resumed to non‐urgent imaging. The volumes were assessed by (1) Imaging indication: cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and surveillance; (2) Care setting: outpatient and inpatient, ED; (3) Hospital type: quaternary academic center (QAC), university‐affiliated community hospital (UACH), and sole community hospitals (SCHs). RESULTS: During the COVID‐19 peak, a significant drop in CT volumes was observed (−42.2%, p < 0.0001), with cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and cancer surveillance declining by 81.7%, 54.8%, 30.7%, and 44.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the post‐COVID‐19 peak period, cancer screening and initial workup CTs did not recover (−11.7%, p = 0.037; −20.0%, p = 0.031), especially in the outpatient setting. CT volumes for active cancer recovered, but inconsistently across hospital types: the QAC experienced a 9.4% decline (p = 0.022) and the UACH a 41.5% increase (p < 0.001). Outpatient CTs recovered after the COVID‐19 peak, but with a shift in utilization away from the QAC (−8.7%, p = 0.020) toward the UACH (+13.3%, p = 0.013). Inpatient and ED‐based oncologic CTs increased post‐peak (+20.0%, p = 0.004 and +33.2%, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer imaging was severely impacted during the COVID‐19 pandemic. CTs for cancer screening and initial workup did not recover to pre‐COVID‐19 levels well into 2020, a finding that suggests more patients with advanced cancers may present in the future. A redistribution of imaging utilization away from the QAC and outpatient settings, toward the community hospitals and inpatient setting/ED was observed.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • academic center and accountability health insurance portability: 1, 2
    • academic center and accountability health insurance portability act: 1, 2
    • academic center and active cancer: 1, 2
    • academic center and active cancer cancer surveillance: 1
    • academic center and active cancer ct: 1
    • academic hospital and active cancer: 1
    • academic hospital and active cancer cancer surveillance: 1
    • academic hospital and active cancer ct: 1
    • academic institution and active cancer: 1
    • academic medical center and accountability health insurance portability: 1, 2
    • academic medical center and accountability health insurance portability act: 1, 2
    • academic outpatient and active cancer: 1
    • academic outpatient and active cancer cancer surveillance: 1
    • academic outpatient and active cancer ct: 1