Author: Bozio, Catherine H; Flanders, W Dana; Finelli, Lyn; Bramley, Anna M; Reed, Carrie; Gandhi, Neel R; Vidal, Jorge E; Erdman, Dean; Levine, Min Z; Lindstrom, Stephen; Ampofo, Krow; Arnold, Sandra R; Self, Wesley H; Williams, Derek J; Grijalva, Carlos G; Anderson, Evan J; McCullers, Jonathan A; Edwards, Kathryn M; Pavia, Andrew T; Wunderink, Richard G; Jain, Seema
Title: Use of Multiple Imputation to Estimate the Proportion of Respiratory Virus Detections Among Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Cord-id: eif7du3j Document date: 2018_3_16
ID: eif7du3j
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on respiratory specimens and serology on paired blood specimens are used to determine the etiology of respiratory illnesses for research studies. However, convalescent serology is often not collected. We used multiple imputation to assign values for missing serology results to estimate virus-specific prevalence among pediatric and adult community-acquired pneumonia hospitalizations using data from an active population-based surveillance study
Document: BACKGROUND: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on respiratory specimens and serology on paired blood specimens are used to determine the etiology of respiratory illnesses for research studies. However, convalescent serology is often not collected. We used multiple imputation to assign values for missing serology results to estimate virus-specific prevalence among pediatric and adult community-acquired pneumonia hospitalizations using data from an active population-based surveillance study. METHODS: Presence of adenoviruses, human metapneumovirus, influenza viruses, parainfluenza virus types 1–3, and respiratory syncytial virus was defined by positive PCR on nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal specimens or a 4-fold rise in paired serology. We performed multiple imputation by developing a multivariable regression model for each virus using data from patients with available serology results. We calculated absolute and relative differences in the proportion of each virus detected comparing the imputed to observed (nonimputed) results. RESULTS: Among 2222 children and 2259 adults, 98.8% and 99.5% had nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal specimens and 43.2% and 37.5% had paired serum specimens, respectively. Imputed results increased viral etiology assignments by an absolute difference of 1.6%–4.4% and 0.8%–2.8% in children and adults, respectively; relative differences were 1.1–3.0 times higher. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple imputation can be used when serology results are missing, to refine virus-specific prevalence estimates, and these will likely increase estimates.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abdominal pain and acute respiratory infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- abdominal pain and acute serum: 1, 2, 3
- abdominal pain diarrhea and acute infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- abdominal pain diarrhea and acute respiratory infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- abdominal pain headache and acute infection: 1, 2, 3, 4
- abdominal pain headache and acute respiratory infection: 1, 2
- absolute difference and acute infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- absolute difference and acute respiratory infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- absolute increase and acute infection: 1
- absolute increase and acute respiratory infection: 1
- absolute increase and acute serum: 1
- active surveillance study and acute infection: 1, 2, 3
- active surveillance study and acute respiratory infection: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date