Selected article for: "reporting testing and RT PCR testing"

Author: Stemler, Jannik; Kramer, Theresa; Dimitriou, Vassiliki; Wieland, Ulrike; Schumacher, Sofie; Sprute, Rosanne; Oberste, Max; Wiesmüller, Gerhard; Rau, Harald; Pieper, Sally; Bethe, Ullrich; Lehmann, Clara; Hellmich, Martin; Klein, Florian; Langebartels, Georg; Cornely, Oliver A.
Title: Mobile PCR-based surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 to reduce visiting restrictions in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot study
  • Cord-id: ci1nvcxw
  • Document date: 2021_10_20
  • ID: ci1nvcxw
    Snippet: PURPOSE: Residents in nursing homes for the elderly (NH) are at high risk for death from COVID-19. We investigated whether repeated non-mandatory RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 surveillance of NH staff and visitors reduces COVID-19 incidence rates in NH residents and allows to reduce visiting restrictions. METHODS: This pilot study at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic compared a surveillance approach of regular, twice-weekly voluntary PCR testing of health-care workers (HCW) and visitors in intervention
    Document: PURPOSE: Residents in nursing homes for the elderly (NH) are at high risk for death from COVID-19. We investigated whether repeated non-mandatory RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 surveillance of NH staff and visitors reduces COVID-19 incidence rates in NH residents and allows to reduce visiting restrictions. METHODS: This pilot study at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic compared a surveillance approach of regular, twice-weekly voluntary PCR testing of health-care workers (HCW) and visitors in interventional NH (INH) with a setting without regular testing in control NH (CNH). Residents were not tested routinely within this study. Testing was performed in a mobile testing site with same-day result reporting. SARS-CoV-2 incidence among residents in both INH and CNH was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints being SARS-CoV-2 infection among visitors and HCW in INH. RESULTS: Two INH and two CNH participated between October and December, 2020. At INH1, 787 tests of HCW and 350 tests of visitors were performed, accounting for 18.1% (n = 1930) of visits. At INH2, 78 tests of HCW and 372 tests of visitors were done, i.e., 30.5% (n = 1220) of visits. At the two INH 23 HCW and three visitors tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 outbreaks occurred among residents in INH1 (identified through study testing) and in CNH1. Utilization of voluntary testing was low. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting without available rapid testing, voluntary RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 testing of HCW and visitors does not prevent COVID-19 outbreaks in NH. Complete, non-selective testing for these groups should be instituted before visiting restrictions can be reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT04933981. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-021-01716-4.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1