Selected article for: "confirmatory testing and neutralization test"

Author: Bartko, Johann; Zehetmayer, Sonja; Weseslindtner, Lukas; Stiasny, Karin; Schloegl, Andrea; Forjan, Ernst; Zwettler, Elisabeth; Krauter, Andreas; Keil, Felix; Sédille-Mostafaie, Nazanin
Title: Screening and Confirmatory Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: Comparison of Health and Non-Health Workers in a Nationwide Healthcare Organization in Central Europe
  • Cord-id: qetgttx2
  • Document date: 2021_4_28
  • ID: qetgttx2
    Snippet: Despite being located close to the European epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, Austria has managed to control the first wave. In Austria, the largest health insurance fund covers 7 million people and has 12,000 employees, including 3700 healthcare workers (HCW). For patient and staff safety, transmission control measures were implemented and mass testing of employees for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was conducted. An IgG SARS-CoV-2 rapid test on fingerstick blood was used as a screening test
    Document: Despite being located close to the European epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, Austria has managed to control the first wave. In Austria, the largest health insurance fund covers 7 million people and has 12,000 employees, including 3700 healthcare workers (HCW). For patient and staff safety, transmission control measures were implemented and mass testing of employees for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was conducted. An IgG SARS-CoV-2 rapid test on fingerstick blood was used as a screening test (ST), followed by serologic studies with 3 different immunoassays and confirmatory testing by a neutralization test (NT). Among 7858 employees, 144 had a positive ST and 88 were confirmed by a NT (1.12%, CI: 0.9–1.38%). The positive predictive value (PPV) of the ST was 69.3% (CI: 60.5–77.2). Interestingly, 40% of the NT positive serum samples were tested negative in all 3 immunoassays. Of the total sample, 2242 HCW (28.5%) were identified. Unexpectedly, there was no difference in the prevalence of NT positives in HCW compared to non-HCW (23/2242 vs. 65/5301, p = 0.53). SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence was not increased among HCW. Although HCW are at potentially increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission control measures in healthcare facilities appear sufficient to limit transmission of infection.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abbott euroimmun and low prevalence: 1
    • abbott euroimmun diasorin and acid amplification testing: 1
    • abbott euroimmun diasorin and low prevalence: 1
    • acid amplification testing and long period: 1
    • acid amplification testing and low prevalence: 1, 2
    • admission prior and low exposure: 1
    • admission prior and low exposure risk: 1
    • admission prior and low prevalence: 1, 2
    • long period and low antibody response: 1
    • long period and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3