Author: Umar Ibrahim, Abdullahi; Ozsoz, Mehmet; Serte, Sertan; Alâ€Turjman, Fadi; Habeeb Kolapo, Salahudeen
Title: Convolutional neural network for diagnosis of viral pneumonia and COVIDâ€19 alike diseases Cord-id: em0jsbcd Document date: 2021_4_26
ID: em0jsbcd
Snippet: Reverseâ€Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTâ€PCR) method is currently the gold standard method for detection of viral strains in human samples, but this technique is very expensive, take time and often leads to misdiagnosis. The recent outbreak of COVIDâ€19 has led scientists to explore other options such as the use of artificial intelligence driven tools as an alternative or a confirmatory approach for detection of viral pneumonia. In this paper, we utilized a Convolutional Neural N
Document: Reverseâ€Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTâ€PCR) method is currently the gold standard method for detection of viral strains in human samples, but this technique is very expensive, take time and often leads to misdiagnosis. The recent outbreak of COVIDâ€19 has led scientists to explore other options such as the use of artificial intelligence driven tools as an alternative or a confirmatory approach for detection of viral pneumonia. In this paper, we utilized a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approach to detect viral pneumonia in xâ€ray images using a pretrained AlexNet model thereby adopting a transfer learning approach. The dataset used for the study was obtained in the form of optical Coherence Tomography and chest Xâ€ray images made available by Kermany et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.17632/rscbjbr9sj.3) with a total number of 5853 pneumonia (positive) and normal (negative) images. To evaluate the average efficiency of the model, the dataset was split into on 50:50, 60:40, 70:30, 80:20 and 90:10 for training and testing respectively. To evaluate the performance of the model, 10 K Crossâ€validation was carried out. The performance of the model using overall dataset was compared with the means of crossâ€validation and the currents state of arts. The classification model has shown high performance in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. 70:30 split performed better compare to other splits with accuracy of 98.73%, sensitivity of 98.59% and specificity of 99.84%.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy test and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accuracy test and loss accuracy: 1, 2, 3
- accurate simple and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- accurate simple and long procedure: 1
- accurate simple cheap and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1
- activation function and acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- activation function and loss accuracy: 1
- acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and adenovirus human metapneumovirus: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute sars cov respiratory syndrome coronavirus and adenovirus human metapneumovirus respiratory syncytial virus: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date