Author: Gustavo Barcelos Barra; Ticiane Henriques Santa Rita; Pedro Goes Mesquita; Rafael Henriques Jacomo; Lidia Freire Abdalla Nery
Title: Analytical sensibility and specificity of two RT-qPCR protocols for SARS-CoV-2 detection performed in an automated workflow Document date: 2020_3_10
ID: kv77pw7y_23
Snippet: So, under our conditions, the N1 and RdRP (modified) showed the highest analytical sensitivity for their RNA targets. E assay, in its original concentration, was considered a tertiary confirmatory assay. Taken together, N1, RdRP (optimized) and E presented appropriated analytical sensibility and specificity in our automated RT-qPCR workflow for COVID-19 virus, E being at least 4-fold less sensitive than the others......
Document: So, under our conditions, the N1 and RdRP (modified) showed the highest analytical sensitivity for their RNA targets. E assay, in its original concentration, was considered a tertiary confirmatory assay. Taken together, N1, RdRP (optimized) and E presented appropriated analytical sensibility and specificity in our automated RT-qPCR workflow for COVID-19 virus, E being at least 4-fold less sensitive than the others.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- analytical sensibility and original concentration: 1
- analytical sensibility and tertiary confirmatory assay: 1
- analytical sensitivity and confirmatory assay: 1, 2
- analytical sensitivity and original concentration: 1, 2
- analytical sensitivity and RNA target: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- analytical sensitivity and tertiary confirmatory assay: 1
- confirmatory assay and original concentration: 1
- confirmatory assay and tertiary confirmatory assay: 1
- original concentration and tertiary confirmatory assay: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date