Selected article for: "Metagenomic sequencing and novel virus"

Author: Tieying Hou; Weiqi Zeng; Minling Yang; Wenjing Chen; Lili Ren; Jingwen Ai; Ji Wu; Yalong Liao; Xuejing Gou; Yongjun Li; Xiaorui Wang; Hang Su; Jianwei Wang; Bing Gu; Teng Xu
Title: Development and Evaluation of A CRISPR-based Diagnostic For 2019-novel Coronavirus
  • Document date: 2020_2_23
  • ID: hth8f5sn_1
    Snippet: Since the beginning of 2020, a surging number of pneumonia caused by infections of a novel 56 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) have been identified in China, especially Wuhan, a metropolitan 57 city with a population of over 10 million. [1, 2] In recent days, the outbreak has affected 58 multiple countries and caused worldwide impact. The epidemic of 2019-nCoV was first discovered by metagenomic next-generation 69 sequencing (mNGS) in which the novel viru.....
    Document: Since the beginning of 2020, a surging number of pneumonia caused by infections of a novel 56 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) have been identified in China, especially Wuhan, a metropolitan 57 city with a population of over 10 million. [1, 2] In recent days, the outbreak has affected 58 multiple countries and caused worldwide impact. The epidemic of 2019-nCoV was first discovered by metagenomic next-generation 69 sequencing (mNGS) in which the novel virus was found to be a new pathogenic member of 70 the betacoronavirus genus but shared only about 79% in genetic similarity with SARS. [8, 9] 71 Currently, metagenomics and RT-PCR are two molecular approaches most commonly used 72 diagnostics for this novel virus. [13, 14] However, the diagnostic performance of different 73 molecular methods have not been investigated. 74 All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • diagnostic performance and molecular method: 1, 2
    • diagnostic performance and novel virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • diagnostic performance and RT PCR metagenomic: 1, 2
    • diagnostic performance and SARS genetic similarity: 1
    • diagnostic performance and surge number: 1
    • genetic similarity and novel virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • genetic similarity and RT PCR metagenomic: 1
    • genetic similarity and SARS genetic similarity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • genetic similarity and worldwide impact: 1
    • molecular approach and novel virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • molecular method and novel virus: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • novel virus and RT PCR metagenomic: 1, 2
    • novel virus and SARS genetic similarity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • novel virus and surge number: 1
    • novel virus and worldwide impact: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • RT PCR metagenomic and SARS genetic similarity: 1