Selected article for: "acute lung injury and lung pressure"

Author: Nick Wilson; Amanda Kvalsvig; Lucy Telfar Barnard; Michael Baker
Title: Estimating the Case Fatality Risk of COVID-19 using Cases from Outside China
  • Document date: 2020_2_18
  • ID: b4kzgubs_6
    Snippet: Based on a news report on 13 February [8] : "Kato said five people from the ship are currently in serious condition in hospital". A prior report on 12 February in the same news source gave more detail for the first four people where the Health Minister (Katsunobu Kato) was reported saying: "At this point, we have confirmed that four people, among those who are hospitalised, are in a serious condition, either on a ventilator or in an intensive car.....
    Document: Based on a news report on 13 February [8] : "Kato said five people from the ship are currently in serious condition in hospital". A prior report on 12 February in the same news source gave more detail for the first four people where the Health Minister (Katsunobu Kato) was reported saying: "At this point, we have confirmed that four people, among those who are hospitalised, are in a serious condition, either on a ventilator or in an intensive care unit." [9] Total 4.0% (14/349) Next we considered the typical survival of people admitted to ICUs with severe respiratory conditions. We used data from a meta-analysis of trials comparing higher vs lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in adults with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [10] . This study found 374 hospital deaths in 1136 patients (32.9%) assigned to treatment with higher PEEP and 409 hospital deaths in 1163 patients (35.2%) assigned to lower PEEP (with no significant difference between these two groups). Combining these data suggests a CFR in such patients with acute lung injury of 34.1% (783/2299). This estimate is a little less than one case series of ICU patients with acute respiratory failure from Influenza A (H1N1) and requiring mechanical ventilation, who had a CFR of 46% (156/337) [11] . Another study of such ICU patients with influenza found a lower overall CFR of 26% (492/1859) [12] and another one reported a CFR of 24% (177/733) [13] . Furthermore, in a group of 340 ICU patients with ARDS, the CFR at 90 days was 32% in a group given a neuromuscular blocker and 41% in the placebo group [14] .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute ARDS respiratory distress syndrome and meta trial analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • acute ARDS respiratory distress syndrome and neuromuscular blocker: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute H1N1 Influenza respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2, 3
    • acute lung injury and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute lung injury and meta trial analysis: 1
    • acute lung injury and neuromuscular blocker: 1
    • ARDS ICU patient and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2
    • ARDS respiratory distress syndrome and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • ARDS respiratory distress syndrome and meta trial analysis: 1, 2, 3
    • ARDS respiratory distress syndrome and neuromuscular blocker: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • care unit and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • care unit and meta trial analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • care unit and neuromuscular blocker: 1, 2, 3
    • care unit and news report: 1
    • case series and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • case series and meta trial analysis: 1, 2
    • distress syndrome and mechanical ventilation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • distress syndrome and meta trial analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • distress syndrome and neuromuscular blocker: 1, 2, 3, 4