Author: Hannah K. Frank; David Enard; Scott D. Boyd
Title: Exceptional diversity and selection pressure on SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 host receptor in bats compared to other mammals Document date: 2020_4_20
ID: ijsn8d7b_22
Snippet: It is possible that the sequences we generated through target capture and genomic sequence 132 were of poorer sequencing quality than the reference genomes (though the number of residues 133 covered by sequences we generated and publicly available reference sequences was similar; 134 two-tailed t-test, t = -0.49, p = 0.63). When we removed the bat sequences we generated and 135 examined the remaining terminal branches, a greater proportion of bat.....
Document: It is possible that the sequences we generated through target capture and genomic sequence 132 were of poorer sequencing quality than the reference genomes (though the number of residues 133 covered by sequences we generated and publicly available reference sequences was similar; 134 two-tailed t-test, t = -0.49, p = 0.63). When we removed the bat sequences we generated and 135 examined the remaining terminal branches, a greater proportion of bat branches were under 136 selection than non-bat branches, but statistical significance was lost, likely due to reduced 137 author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- bat sequence and reference sequence: 1, 2
- bat sequence and residue number: 1
- genomic sequence and reference genome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- genomic sequence and reference sequence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
- poor sequencing quality and reference genome: 1
- reference sequence and residue number: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date