Selected article for: "logistic regression and significant difference"
Author: Hui Xu; Li Yan; Chun (Martin) Qiu; Bo Jiao; Yanyan Chen; Xi Tan; Zhuo Chen; Ling Ai; Yaru Xiao; Ailin Luo; Shusheng Li
Title: Analysis and Prediction of False Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Detection with Pharyngeal Swab Specimen in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study
  • Document date: 2020_3_30
    • ID: 9edp04ud_63
    Snippet: While previous research showed that both genders are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection (1, 3) , this study found that gender difference between FNAC-P and FNAC-N patients was statistically significant. Although gender was not significant in the univariate context, in the multivariate context, the effect of gender was significant and robust, as both the logistic regression and the AFT model provided strong evidence to support it......
    Document: While previous research showed that both genders are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection (1, 3) , this study found that gender difference between FNAC-P and FNAC-N patients was statistically significant. Although gender was not significant in the univariate context, in the multivariate context, the effect of gender was significant and robust, as both the logistic regression and the AFT model provided strong evidence to support it.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • AFT model logistic regression and logistic regression: 1
    • gender difference and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • gender difference and SARS virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • gender difference and strong evidence: 1, 2
    • gender effect and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • gender effect and previous research: 1
    • gender effect and SARS virus: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression and multivariate context: 1
    • logistic regression and previous research: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and SARS virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and SARS virus infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • logistic regression and strong evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • logistic regression and support strong evidence: 1
    • logistic regression and univariate context: 1
    • multivariate context and univariate context: 1
    • previous research and SARS virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • previous research and strong evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • SARS virus and strong evidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • SARS virus and support strong evidence: 1