Selected article for: "confidence interval and meta analysis"

Author: John P. A. Ioannidis; Cathrine Axfors; Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis
Title: Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters
  • Document date: 2020_4_8
  • ID: 2cwvga0k_38
    Snippet: A meta-analysis of the three datasets, showed that by random effects, deaths that occurred in patients with no underlying conditions and who were <65 years old account for 0.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.7%) of all deaths where presence of underlying conditions has been assessed. There was large between-dataset heterogeneity (I 2 =87%, p=0.0003 for heterogeneity)......
    Document: A meta-analysis of the three datasets, showed that by random effects, deaths that occurred in patients with no underlying conditions and who were <65 years old account for 0.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.7%) of all deaths where presence of underlying conditions has been assessed. There was large between-dataset heterogeneity (I 2 =87%, p=0.0003 for heterogeneity).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • confidence interval and random effect: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • dataset analysis and meta dataset analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • dataset analysis and random effect: 1, 2
    • dataset heterogeneity and meta dataset analysis: 1
    • dataset heterogeneity and random effect: 1
    • meta dataset analysis and random effect: 1