Selected article for: "parameter value and table s1"

Author: Monique R. Ambrose; Adam J. Kucharski; Pierre Formenty; Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum; Anne W. Rimoin; James O. Lloyd-Smith
Title: Quantifying transmission of emerging zoonoses: Using mathematical models to maximize the value of surveillance data
  • Document date: 2019_6_19
  • ID: f14u2sz5_9
    Snippet: We tested the performance of the corrected-denominator method against simulated 288 datasets, looking at the same parameter sets as in the first section. The inferred parameter values 289 cluster well with their corresponding true values ( Fig 3C) : mean percent error in R estimates was 290 8.4% and in λ z estimates was 14.0%. Across the 125 simulations, the true parameter value was 291 included in the 95% CI 116 times (92.8%) for R and 117 time.....
    Document: We tested the performance of the corrected-denominator method against simulated 288 datasets, looking at the same parameter sets as in the first section. The inferred parameter values 289 cluster well with their corresponding true values ( Fig 3C) : mean percent error in R estimates was 290 8.4% and in λ z estimates was 14.0%. Across the 125 simulations, the true parameter value was 291 included in the 95% CI 116 times (92.8%) for R and 117 times (93.6%) for λ z (S1 Table) . 292

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • parameter set and true value: 1, 2, 3
    • parameter value and true parameter value: 1
    • parameter value and true value: 1, 2
    • percent error and true value: 1