Selected article for: "average time and removal rate"

Author: Xiaolin Zhu; Aiyin Zhang; Shuai Xu; Pengfei Jia; Xiaoyue Tan; Jiaqi Tian; Tao Wei; Zhenxian Quan; Jiali Yu
Title: Spatially Explicit Modeling of 2019-nCoV Epidemic Trend based on Mobile Phone Data in Mainland China
  • Document date: 2020_2_11
  • ID: 6u9q0ox9_13
    Snippet: We predicted the epidemic dynamics in the next 30 days under three scenarios: the current trend maintained (scenario 1), control efforts expanded (scenario 2), person-to-person contacts increased due to work resuming (scenario 3). These three scenarios were designed by considering the joint effect of virus transmissibility and outbreak control 18, 19 and realized by manipulating model parameters from February 11, 2020 to March 12, 2020 (see an ex.....
    Document: We predicted the epidemic dynamics in the next 30 days under three scenarios: the current trend maintained (scenario 1), control efforts expanded (scenario 2), person-to-person contacts increased due to work resuming (scenario 3). These three scenarios were designed by considering the joint effect of virus transmissibility and outbreak control 18, 19 and realized by manipulating model parameters from February 11, 2020 to March 12, 2020 (see an example in Figure 3 ). Decay rate reveals the effectiveness of government control and removal rate represents the promptness of medical treatment. Therefore, scenario 1 keeps a value the same as the trained model. In scenario 2, we doubled the value of a to reflect more efforts in each city for controlling the disease. In scenario 3, the interference of work resuming was considered, so a short rebound was introduced to the transmission rate (i.e. changing a to -a during February 11-15 period). in all scenarios gradually increased from 1/14.3 to 1/9.8 in the 30 days to reflect the reduction of average diagnostic isolation time 20 .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • city effort and current trend: 1, 2
    • city effort and decay rate: 1, 2
    • city effort and disease control: 1, 2
    • city effort and disease control city effort: 1, 2
    • city effort and government control: 1
    • city effort and person person: 1
    • city effort and person person contact: 1
    • city effort and transmission rate: 1, 2
    • control effort and current trend: 1, 2, 3
    • control effort and decay rate: 1, 2
    • control effort and disease control: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33
    • control effort and disease control city effort: 1, 2
    • control effort and epidemic dynamic: 1
    • control effort and government control: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • control effort and medical treatment: 1, 2
    • control effort and person person: 1, 2
    • control effort and person person contact: 1
    • control effort and transmission rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • control effort and virus transmissibility: 1