Selected article for: "attack rate and social distancing impact"

Author: Jane Cheatley; Sabine Vuik; Marion Devaux; Stefano Scarpetta; Mark Pearson; Francesca Colombo; Michele Cecchini
Title: The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing epidemics: a rapid review of the literature and quantitative assessment
  • Document date: 2020_4_10
  • ID: jab7vp33_6
    Snippet: Several studies analysing the impact of social distancing on disease outbreaks exist (Chen et al., 2020[3] ). For example, a systematic review of workplace social distancing found the policy reduces the influenza attack rate (i.e. the proportion of individuals in a population who contract the disease) by 23% in the general population (Ahmed, Zviedrite and Uzicanin, 2018 [4] ). This is supported by an earlier study which found working-from-home wa.....
    Document: Several studies analysing the impact of social distancing on disease outbreaks exist (Chen et al., 2020[3] ). For example, a systematic review of workplace social distancing found the policy reduces the influenza attack rate (i.e. the proportion of individuals in a population who contract the disease) by 23% in the general population (Ahmed, Zviedrite and Uzicanin, 2018 [4] ). This is supported by an earlier study which found working-from-home was 'moderately effective' in reducing influenza transmission by 20-30% (Rashid et al., 2015[5] ). Further, social distancing in Sydney, Australia, during the 1918-19 influenza pandemic is estimated to have reduced the attack rate by nearly 40% (i.e. from 60% to 37%) indicating 22% of the population were spared infection (Caley, Philp and McCracken, 2008[6] ).

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • attack rate and early study: 1, 2, 3
    • attack rate and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
    • attack rate and home working: 1, 2
    • attack rate and influenza attack rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • attack rate and influenza pandemic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • attack rate and influenza transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • attack rate and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • attack rate and workplace social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • attack rate reduce and general population: 1
    • attack rate reduce and home working: 1, 2
    • attack rate reduce and influenza attack rate: 1
    • attack rate reduce and influenza pandemic: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • attack rate reduce and influenza transmission: 1, 2, 3
    • attack rate reduce and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • attack rate reduce and workplace social distancing: 1, 2
    • disease contract and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • disease contract and social distancing: 1, 2, 3
    • disease contract population and general population: 1, 2
    • disease contract population and social distancing: 1