Author: Jane Cheatley; Sabine Vuik; Marion Devaux; Stefano Scarpetta; Mark Pearson; Francesca Colombo; Michele Cecchini
Title: The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing epidemics: a rapid review of the literature and quantitative assessment Document date: 2020_4_10
ID: jab7vp33_6
Snippet: Several studies analysing the impact of social distancing on disease outbreaks exist (Chen et al., 2020[3] ). For example, a systematic review of workplace social distancing found the policy reduces the influenza attack rate (i.e. the proportion of individuals in a population who contract the disease) by 23% in the general population (Ahmed, Zviedrite and Uzicanin, 2018 [4] ). This is supported by an earlier study which found working-from-home wa.....
Document: Several studies analysing the impact of social distancing on disease outbreaks exist (Chen et al., 2020[3] ). For example, a systematic review of workplace social distancing found the policy reduces the influenza attack rate (i.e. the proportion of individuals in a population who contract the disease) by 23% in the general population (Ahmed, Zviedrite and Uzicanin, 2018 [4] ). This is supported by an earlier study which found working-from-home was 'moderately effective' in reducing influenza transmission by 20-30% (Rashid et al., 2015[5] ). Further, social distancing in Sydney, Australia, during the 1918-19 influenza pandemic is estimated to have reduced the attack rate by nearly 40% (i.e. from 60% to 37%) indicating 22% of the population were spared infection (Caley, Philp and McCracken, 2008[6] ).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- attack rate and early study: 1, 2, 3
- attack rate and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- attack rate and home working: 1, 2
- attack rate and influenza attack rate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
- attack rate and influenza pandemic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46
- attack rate and influenza transmission: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
- attack rate and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- attack rate and workplace social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4
- attack rate reduce and general population: 1
- attack rate reduce and home working: 1, 2
- attack rate reduce and influenza attack rate: 1
- attack rate reduce and influenza pandemic: 1, 2, 3, 4
- attack rate reduce and influenza transmission: 1, 2, 3
- attack rate reduce and social distancing: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- attack rate reduce and workplace social distancing: 1, 2
- disease contract and general population: 1, 2, 3, 4
- disease contract and social distancing: 1, 2, 3
- disease contract population and general population: 1, 2
- disease contract population and social distancing: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date