Selected article for: "good performance and mean score"

Author: Simusika, Paul; Tempia, Stefano; Chentulo, Edward; Polansky, Lauren; Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy; Ndumba, Idah; Mbewe, Quinn K.; Monze, Mwaka
Title: An evaluation of the Zambia influenza sentinel surveillance system, 2011–2017
  • Document date: 2020_1_13
  • ID: 0pfrk5uk_40
    Snippet: During the evaluation period, all four evaluated indicators had good performance (Table 3 ). More than 90% of surveillance staff was satisfied or very satisfied with the surveillance reports or the feedback of laboratory results. Surveillance activities did not pose a heavy workload on surveillance staff in addition to the required clinical work. The mean score for acceptability was 3.0 (good performance) ( Table 1) ......
    Document: During the evaluation period, all four evaluated indicators had good performance (Table 3 ). More than 90% of surveillance staff was satisfied or very satisfied with the surveillance reports or the feedback of laboratory results. Surveillance activities did not pose a heavy workload on surveillance staff in addition to the required clinical work. The mean score for acceptability was 3.0 (good performance) ( Table 1) .

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • clinical work and evaluation period: 1
    • clinical work and good performance: 1
    • clinical work and heavy workload: 1
    • clinical work and mean score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • clinical work and required clinical work: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • clinical work and surveillance staff: 1, 2
    • evaluated indicator and good performance: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • evaluated indicator and mean score: 1
    • evaluated indicator and surveillance staff: 1, 2
    • evaluation period and good performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • evaluation period and mean score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • evaluation period and surveillance staff: 1, 2
    • good performance and mean score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • good performance and surveillance staff: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • laboratory result and surveillance report: 1
    • mean score and surveillance activity: 1, 2
    • mean score and surveillance staff: 1, 2, 3