Author: Simusika, Paul; Tempia, Stefano; Chentulo, Edward; Polansky, Lauren; Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy; Ndumba, Idah; Mbewe, Quinn K.; Monze, Mwaka
Title: An evaluation of the Zambia influenza sentinel surveillance system, 2011–2017 Document date: 2020_1_13
ID: 0pfrk5uk_42
Snippet: During the evaluation period, of the eight indicators, five had good performance and three had moderate performance (Table 4 ). All surveillance sites provided samples weekly during the evaluation period. The main aspects that affected stability were elevated frequencies of electricity cuts and generator failures. Approximately 30% of surveillance staff did not receive annual refresher training during the last year and approximately 30% of expect.....
Document: During the evaluation period, of the eight indicators, five had good performance and three had moderate performance (Table 4 ). All surveillance sites provided samples weekly during the evaluation period. The main aspects that affected stability were elevated frequencies of electricity cuts and generator failures. Approximately 30% of surveillance staff did not receive annual refresher training during the last year and approximately 30% of expected weekly reports were not sent to the Zambia MoH within the expected time frame (one week from the end of the reported period). The mean score for stability was 2.6 (moderate to good performance) ( Table 1) .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- evaluation period and mean score: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- evaluation period and moderate performance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- evaluation period and report period: 1
- evaluation period and sample provide: 1
- evaluation period and surveillance staff: 1, 2
- evaluation period and time frame: 1, 2
- evaluation period and Zambia moh: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date