Author: Xueyan Mei; Hao-Chih Lee; Kaiyue Diao; Mingqian Huang; Bin Lin; Chenyu Liu; Zongyu Xie; Yixuan Ma; Philip M. Robson; Michael Chung; Adam Bernheim; Venkatesh Mani; Claudia Calcagno; Kunwei Li; Shaolin Li; Hong Shan; Jian Lv; Tongtong Zhao; Junli Xia; Qihua Long; Sharon Steinberger; Adam Jacobi; Timothy Deyer; Marta Luksza; Fang Liu; Brent P. Little; Zahi A. Fayad; Yang Yang
Title: Artificial intelligence for rapid identification of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Document date: 2020_4_17
ID: 79tozwzq_3
Snippet: In our study, our proposed joint AI algorithm combining CT images and clinical history achieved an AUC of 0.92 when applied to a testing set of 279 cases. The AI model performed equally well in sensitivity as compared to a senior chest radiologist (AUC of 0.84), and out-performed a less experienced chest fellow (AUC of 0.73). When the AI model used only CT images or only clinical information the performance was lower (AUC of 0.86, and 0.80, respe.....
Document: In our study, our proposed joint AI algorithm combining CT images and clinical history achieved an AUC of 0.92 when applied to a testing set of 279 cases. The AI model performed equally well in sensitivity as compared to a senior chest radiologist (AUC of 0.84), and out-performed a less experienced chest fellow (AUC of 0.73). When the AI model used only CT images or only clinical information the performance was lower (AUC of 0.86, and 0.80, respectively). The AI model with clinical information only and the joint AI model also improved the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive patients who presented with a normal CT, achieving a detection rate of 64% and 68% respectively, compared to radiologists who rated all such patients as SARS-CoV-2 (-). While the vast majority of suspected patients currently have little option but to wait for RT-PCR test results, All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- detection rate and RT PCR test result: 1, 2
- detection rate and SARS patient: 1, 2, 3, 4
- detection rate and test result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- detection rate and testing set: 1
- detection rate and vast majority: 1
- respectively auc and test result: 1
- respectively auc and testing set: 1
- respectively auc and vast majority: 1
- RT PCR positive patient and SARS patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- RT PCR positive patient and suspect patient: 1
- RT PCR positive patient and test result: 1, 2
- RT PCR test result and SARS patient: 1, 2
- RT PCR test result and test result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- SARS patient and suspect patient: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- SARS patient and test result: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- SARS patient and vast majority: 1, 2
- suspect patient and vast majority: 1
- test result and vast majority: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date